Suppr超能文献

滴滴涕在添加污染物沉积物暴露实验中对淡水双壳类动物的毒性及生物累积

Toxicity and bioaccumulation of DDT in freshwater amphipods in exposures to spiked sediments.

作者信息

Lotufo G R, Landrum P F, Gedeon M L

机构信息

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Apr;20(4):810-25. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(2001)020<0810:tabodi>2.0.co;2.

Abstract

The amphipods Hyalella azteca and Diporeia spp. were exposed to sediments dosed with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and the toxicity and toxicokinetics were determined. The toxicity was evaluated with the equilibrium partitioning (EqP) and critical body residue approaches. The DDT in the sediments degraded during the equilibration period prior to organism exposure. Thus, the toxicity using EqP pore-water toxic units (TUs) was evaluated for DDT and its degradation product, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD), as the ratio of the predicted interstitial water concentration divided by the water-only LC50 values. The sum of TUs (sum(TU)) was assumed to best represent the toxicity of the mixture. For H. azteca, the 10-d LC50 was 0.98 and 0.33 sum(TU) for two experiments. For Diporeia spp., no toxicity was found in the first experiment with up to 3 sum(TU) predicted in the interstitial water. However, in the second experiment, the 28-d LC50 was 0.67 sum(TU). These data suggest that the EqP approach approximately predicts the toxicity for the combination of DDT and DDD in sediment, provided a toxic unit approach is employed. The critical body residue approach also used TUs because DDT is biotransformed by H. azteca and because of the dual exposure to DDT and DDD. Because biotransformation was only determined in the second experiment, the critical body residue approach could only be evaluated for that case. The TUs were calculated as the ratio of the concentration in the live amphipods divided by the respective LR50 (residue concentration required to produce 50% mortality) values. The LR50 was 1.1 sum(TU) for H. azteca for the 10-d exposure and 0.53 for Diporeia spp. after a 28-d exposure. Thus, this approach was also quite successful in predicting the toxicity. The accumulation and loss rates for H. azteca were much greater than for Diporeia spp. Thus, 10-d exposures represent steady-state conditions for H. azteca, while even at 28-d, the Diporeia spp. are not at steady state.

摘要

将双刺猛水蚤(Hyalella azteca)和迪氏蜉蝣(Diporeia spp.)暴露于添加了二氯二苯三氯乙烷(DDT)的沉积物中,并测定其毒性和毒代动力学。采用平衡分配(EqP)和临界体内残留量方法评估毒性。在生物体暴露前的平衡期内,沉积物中的DDT发生了降解。因此,使用EqP孔隙水毒性单位(TUs)评估了DDT及其降解产物二氯二苯二氯乙烷(DDD)的毒性,计算方法为预测的间隙水浓度除以仅在水中的LC50值。假定TUs总和(sum(TU))最能代表混合物的毒性。对于双刺猛水蚤,在两个实验中,10天的LC50分别为0.98和0.33 sum(TU)。对于迪氏蜉蝣,在第一个实验中,间隙水中预测的毒性高达3 sum(TU)时未发现毒性。然而,在第二个实验中,28天的LC50为0.67 sum(TU)。这些数据表明,如果采用毒性单位方法,EqP方法大致可以预测沉积物中DDT和DDD组合的毒性。临界体内残留量方法也使用了TUs,这是因为双刺猛水蚤会对DDT进行生物转化,且同时暴露于DDT和DDD。由于仅在第二个实验中测定了生物转化,因此临界体内残留量方法只能针对该情况进行评估。TUs的计算方法为活体猛水蚤体内的浓度除以各自的LR50(产生50%死亡率所需的残留浓度)值。双刺猛水蚤10天暴露的LR50为1.1 sum(TU),迪氏蜉蝣28天暴露后的LR50为0.53。因此,该方法在预测毒性方面也相当成功。双刺猛水蚤的积累和损失速率远高于迪氏蜉蝣。因此,10天的暴露对双刺猛水蚤而言代表稳态条件,而即使在28天时,迪氏蜉蝣仍未达到稳态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验