使用骨锚式助听器(BAHA)进行听力康复:40例患者的结果。

Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.

作者信息

Lustig L R, Arts H A, Brackmann D E, Francis H F, Molony T, Megerian C A, Moore G F, Moore K M, Morrow T, Potsic W, Rubenstein J T, Srireddy S, Syms C A, Takahashi G, Vernick D, Wackym P A, Niparko J K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2001 May;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200105000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the U.S. experience with the first 40 patients who have undergone audiologic rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a multicenter, nonblinded, retrospective case series.

SETTING

Twelve tertiary referral medical centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

Eligibility for BAHA implantation included patients with a hearing loss and an inability to tolerate a conventional hearing aid, with bone-conduction pure tone average levels at 60 dB or less at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz.

INTERVENTION

Patients who met audiologic and clinical criteria were implanted with the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA, Entific Corp., Gothenburg, Sweden).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative air- and bone-conduction thresholds and air-bone gap; postoperative BAHA-aided thresholds; hearing improvement as a result of implantation; implantation complications; and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The most common indications for implantation included chronic otitis media or draining ears (18 patients) and external auditory canal stenosis or aural atresia (7 patients). Overall, each patient had an average improvement of 32+/-19 dB with the use of the BAHA. Closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB of the preoperative bone-conduction thresholds (postoperative BAHA-aided threshold vs. preoperative bone-conduction threshold) occurred in 32 patients (80%), whereas closure to within 5 dB occurred in 24 patients (60%). Twelve patients (30%) demonstrated 'overclosure' of the preoperative bone-conduction threshold of the better hearing ear. Complications were limited to local infection and inflammation at the implant site in three patients, and failure to osseointegrate in one patient. Patient response to the implant was uniformly satisfactory. Only one patient reported dissatisfaction with the device.

CONCLUSIONS

The BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid provides a reliable and predictable adjunct for auditory rehabilitation in appropriately selected patients, offering a means of dramatically improving hearing thresholds in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss who are otherwise unable to benefit from traditional hearing aids.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了美国首批40例使用骨锚式助听器(BAHA)进行听力学康复患者的情况。

研究设计

本研究是一项多中心、非盲、回顾性病例系列研究。

研究地点

美国12家三级转诊医疗中心。

患者

BAHA植入的入选标准包括听力损失且无法耐受传统助听器、在0.5、1、2和4kHz频率下骨导纯音平均水平在60dB或更低的患者。

干预措施

符合听力学和临床标准的患者植入骨锚式助听器(BAHA,Entific公司,瑞典哥德堡)。

主要观察指标

术前气导和骨导阈值及气骨导差;术后BAHA辅助阈值;植入后听力改善情况;植入并发症;以及患者满意度。

结果

最常见的植入适应证包括慢性中耳炎或耳流脓(18例患者)和外耳道狭窄或闭锁(7例患者)。总体而言,每位患者使用BAHA后平均听力改善32±19dB。32例患者(80%)的气骨导差缩小至术前骨导阈值的10dB以内(术后BAHA辅助阈值与术前骨导阈值相比),而缩小至5dB以内的有24例患者(60%)。12例患者(30%)较好听力耳的术前骨导阈值出现“过度缩小”。并发症仅限于3例患者植入部位的局部感染和炎症,1例患者骨整合失败。患者对植入物的反应总体令人满意。只有1例患者报告对该装置不满意。

结论

骨锚式助听器(BAHA)为经过适当选择的患者提供了一种可靠且可预测的听觉康复辅助手段,为那些无法从传统助听器中获益的传导性或混合性听力损失患者提供了显著改善听力阈值的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索