Rabaud N E, James T A, Ashbaugh L L, Flocchini R G
Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Mar 15;35(6):1190-6. doi: 10.1021/es0012624.
Few data are available on the ammonia emissions of large-scale outdoor animal facilities in arid climates such as those found in California's San Joaquin Valley. Passive samplers provide an ideal tool for studying such large and heterogeneous area sources, because they are inexpensive, portable, and fully self-contained. UC Davis passive ammonia samplers incorporate modifications on a previous design, the Willems Badge, for ease of analysis. Citric acid was chosen as a coating medium though it performed as well as oxalic, sulfuric, and tartaric acids. Zefluor PTFE prefilters were used instead of Teflo though both showed the same resistance to diffusion. Citric acid-coated filters were stable for up to 10 weeks, though more so if stored in Petri dishes rather than in the sampling cassettes themselves. The most effective sampler position was found to be in a face-down configuration fixed into the wind to avoid debris and sensitivity to wind shifts. A new method of rinsing the filters within the cassettes by dropwise elution proved highly effective, with 85% of the ammonium being removed in the first 3 mL of the 10-mL rinse volume. Application of the sampler at a dairy in the Joaquin Valley revealed large variations in concentrations at different locations along the downwind fenceline, which correlated with animal populations and activities directly upwind. In addition, large variations in ammonia concentrations were observed in relation to time of day and animal activity. Field blank loadings were of 1.40 microg NH4-N/filter (SD = 0.74 microg NH4-N/filter). Replicate passive samplers placed side-by-side during sampling episodes agreed with a slope of 1.010 (standard error = 0.028). Impingers were used as a reference method to obtain the correlation between filter loadings and air concentrations, yielding an "effective sampling rate" for the passive samplers of 6.18 L/h (error = 0.23 L/h). Using a theoretical calculation, that "effective flow rate" was calculated to be 6.29 L/h. The method's limit of detection was found to be 82.5 microg NH4-N/m3. Wind speed was found to theoretically affect linearity of sampler response only for speeds less than 0.92 m/s.
关于干旱气候下大型户外动物设施(如加利福尼亚州圣华金谷的设施)的氨气排放数据很少。被动采样器为研究此类大型且异质的面源提供了理想工具,因为它们价格低廉、便于携带且完全独立。加州大学戴维斯分校的被动氨气采样器在先前设计(威廉姆斯徽章)的基础上进行了改进,以便于分析。尽管柠檬酸与草酸、硫酸和酒石酸的性能相当,但仍被选作涂层介质。使用了Zefluor PTFE预过滤器而非Teflo,尽管两者对扩散的阻力相同。涂有柠檬酸的过滤器在长达10周的时间内保持稳定,不过如果储存在培养皿中而非采样盒本身中则更稳定。发现最有效的采样器位置是面朝下固定在风中,以避免碎片并减少对风向变化的敏感度。一种通过逐滴洗脱在采样盒内冲洗过滤器的新方法被证明非常有效,在10毫升冲洗体积的前3毫升中可去除85%的铵。在圣华金谷的一家奶牛场应用该采样器发现,沿顺风围栏线不同位置的浓度存在很大差异,这与直接上风处的动物数量和活动相关。此外,观察到氨气浓度在一天中的不同时间以及动物活动期间有很大变化。现场空白负载为1.40微克NH4 - N/过滤器(标准差 = 0.74微克NH4 - N/过滤器)。在采样期间并排放置的重复被动采样器的斜率为1.010(标准误差 = 0.028)。使用冲击式吸收管作为参考方法来获取过滤器负载与空气浓度之间的相关性,得出被动采样器的“有效采样率”为6.18升/小时(误差 = 0.23升/小时)。通过理论计算,该“有效流速”经计算为6.29升/小时。发现该方法的检测限为82.5微克NH4 - N/立方米。理论上发现风速仅在小于0.92米/秒时会影响采样器响应的线性度。