Suppr超能文献

抑郁、躁狂和正常受试者的自评情绪维度。

Dimensions of self-rated mood in depressed, manic, and normal subjects.

作者信息

Ahearn E P, Cassidy F, Kelley L, Weisler R H, Carroll B J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2001 May-Jun;42(3):196-201. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.23125.

Abstract

Self-rated scales allow the comparison of subjective mood across the spectrum of manic, depressive, and euthymic states. This study examined the self-reported mood of manic, depressed, and normal subjects using a 23-item research instrument based on the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The Multiple Visual Analog Scale (MVAS) measures the following dimensions: consummatory reward (seven items), incentive reward (two items), psychomotor speed (seven items), and central pain (seven items). The MVAS was completed by 31 manic inpatients, 43 depressed inpatients, and 29 normal volunteer subjects. Total scores, average item scores, and total dimension scores were obtained. Subjects also completed a global mood VAS and the Carroll Depression Scale (CDS). Groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn methods. In a separate post hoc analysis, the group of manic patients was divided at the median CDS score into "pure" and "dysphoric" manic subgroups. We found excellent congruence of average 23-item total MVAS scores with global VAS and CDS scores. Dimension scores on the MVAS conformed to the predictions of the Carroll-Klein model. Depressed patients differed significantly from both manic and normal subjects on each dimension. MVAS dimension scores of normal subjects did not differ significantly from those of manic patients. On the dimension of central pain, normal subjects had significantly less inhibited scores than the "pure" subgroup of manics. The results confirmed that the dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model are bipolar and orthogonal. By the MVAS technique, the self-reported mood of normal subjects is similar to the self-reported mood of manic patients on all dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The positive scores of both groups are clearly distinguished from the negative scores of depressed patients. Average MVAS scores of normal subjects approximated the conventional zero score only on the dimension of central pain. Normal subjects exhibit megalothymic (hyperthymia) on most dimensions of subjective mood. The negative MVAS scores of depressed patients are even more deviant from normal than the conventional scoring system would suggest.

摘要

自评量表能够对躁狂、抑郁和心境正常状态下的主观情绪进行比较。本研究使用基于双相情感障碍卡罗尔 - 克莱因模型的23项研究工具,对躁狂、抑郁和正常受试者的自我报告情绪进行了检查。多重视觉模拟量表(MVAS)测量以下维度:满足性奖赏(7项)、激励性奖赏(2项)、精神运动速度(7项)和中枢性疼痛(7项)。31名躁狂症住院患者、43名抑郁症住院患者和29名正常志愿者完成了MVAS。获得了总分、平均项目得分和总维度得分。受试者还完成了整体情绪视觉模拟量表(VAS)和卡罗尔抑郁量表(CDS)。通过方差分析(ANOVA)和事后邦费罗尼 - 邓恩方法对各组进行比较。在一项单独的事后分析中,将躁狂症患者组按CDS得分中位数分为“单纯”和“烦躁”躁狂亚组。我们发现,MVAS平均23项总分与整体VAS和CDS得分具有高度一致性。MVAS上的维度得分符合卡罗尔 - 克莱因模型的预测。抑郁症患者在每个维度上与躁狂症患者和正常受试者均有显著差异。正常受试者的MVAS维度得分与躁狂症患者的得分无显著差异。在中枢性疼痛维度上,正常受试者的抑制得分明显低于躁狂症患者的“单纯”亚组。结果证实,卡罗尔 - 克莱因模型的维度是双相且正交的。通过MVAS技术,在双相情感障碍卡罗尔 - 克莱因模型的所有维度上,正常受试者的自我报告情绪与躁狂症患者的自我报告情绪相似。两组的阳性得分与抑郁症患者的阴性得分明显区分开来。正常受试者的MVAS平均得分仅在中枢性疼痛维度上接近传统的零分。正常受试者在主观情绪的大多数维度上表现出夸大心境(情绪高涨)。抑郁症患者MVAS的阴性得分比传统评分系统所显示的更偏离正常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验