Dishman R K, Graham R E, Buckworth J, White-Welkley J
Department of Exercise Science, The University of Georgia, Athens 30602-6554, USA.
Int J Sports Med. 2001 Apr;22(3):209-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16381.
Recent publications have perpetuated a concern that the Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP) influences ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during exercise testing. Previous studies of this topic used the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS) which lacks validity for predicting the criterion Structured Interview (SI) for TABP and used exercise protocols that were unstandardized or yielded results that were uninterpretable for clinical exercise prescription. We used the SI to classify 44 normotensive men (18-35 y) according to TABP and compared their RPE during an incremental cycling test to peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Groups did not differ on maximal test performance or RPE at any stage of the test, even after adjusting RPE for small group variations in % VO2peak and ventilatory equivalent for oxygen, which are strong correlates of RPE during incremental exercise. The findings agree with our prior report [14] that no relationship existed between RPE and several self-report measures of TABP. We conclude that there is no empirical basis for the view that the Type A Behavior Pattern affects cycling performance or ratings of perceived exertion during standard exercise testing in young white men.
最近的出版物使一种担忧持续存在,即A型行为模式(TABP)会影响运动测试期间的主观用力感觉评分(RPE)。此前关于该主题的研究使用了詹金斯活动调查问卷(JAS),该问卷在预测TABP的标准结构化访谈(SI)方面缺乏效度,并且使用的运动方案未标准化,或者得出的结果对于临床运动处方而言无法解释。我们使用SI根据TABP对44名血压正常的男性(18 - 35岁)进行分类,并在递增式自行车测试至峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)期间比较他们的RPE。即使在针对测试各阶段的最大测试表现或RPE对VO2peak百分比和氧通气当量的小组微小差异调整RPE之后(这些在递增运动期间与RPE密切相关),各小组之间在测试的任何阶段均无差异。这些发现与我们之前的报告[14]一致,即RPE与几种TABP的自我报告测量指标之间不存在关系。我们得出结论,对于A型行为模式会影响年轻白人男性在标准运动测试期间的自行车运动表现或主观用力感觉评分这一观点,没有实证依据。