Angelaki D E, Green A M, Dickman J D
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):3968-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-11-03968.2001.
Rotational and translational vestibulo-ocular reflexes (RVOR and TrVOR) function to maintain stable binocular fixation during head movements. Despite similar functional roles, differences in behavioral, neuroanatomical, and sensory afferent properties suggest that the sensorimotor processing may be partially distinct for the RVOR and TrVOR. To investigate the currently poorly understood neural correlates for the TrVOR, the activities of eye movement-sensitive neurons in the rostral vestibular nuclei were examined during pure translation and rotation under both stable gaze and suppression conditions. Two main conclusions were made. First, the 0.5 Hz firing rates of cells that carry both sensory head movement and motor-like signals during rotation were more strongly related to the oculomotor output than to the vestibular sensory signal during translation. Second, neurons the firing rates of which increased for ipsilaterally versus contralaterally directed eye movements (eye-ipsi and eye-contra cells, respectively) exhibited distinct dynamic properties during TrVOR suppression. Eye-ipsi neurons demonstrated relatively flat dynamics that was similar to that of the majority of vestibular-only neurons. In contrast, eye-contra cells were characterized by low-pass filter dynamics relative to linear acceleration and lower sensitivities than eye-ipsi cells. In fact, the main secondary eye-contra neuron in the disynaptic RVOR pathways (position-vestibular-pause cell) that exhibits a robust modulation during RVOR suppression did not modulate during TrVOR suppression. To explain these results, a simple model is proposed that is consistent with the known neuroanatomy and postulates differential projections of sensory canal and otolith signals onto eye-contra and eye-ipsi cells, respectively, within a shared premotor circuitry that generates the VORs.
旋转和平移前庭眼反射(RVOR和TrVOR)的作用是在头部运动期间维持稳定的双眼注视。尽管功能相似,但行为、神经解剖和感觉传入特性的差异表明,RVOR和TrVOR的感觉运动处理可能部分不同。为了研究目前对TrVOR了解较少的神经相关性,在稳定注视和抑制条件下的纯平移和旋转过程中,检查了延髓前庭核中眼动敏感神经元的活动。得出了两个主要结论。首先,在旋转过程中携带感觉头部运动和运动样信号的细胞的0.5Hz放电率与眼动输出的相关性比与平移过程中的前庭感觉信号的相关性更强。其次,其放电率在同侧与对侧眼动时增加的神经元(分别为眼同侧和眼对侧细胞)在TrVOR抑制期间表现出不同的动态特性。眼同侧神经元表现出相对平稳的动态,这与大多数仅前庭神经元的动态相似。相比之下,眼对侧细胞的特征是相对于线性加速度的低通滤波器动态,并且比眼同侧细胞的敏感性低。事实上,在RVOR抑制期间表现出强烈调制的双突触RVOR通路中的主要次级眼对侧神经元(位置-前庭-暂停细胞)在TrVOR抑制期间没有调制。为了解释这些结果,提出了一个简单的模型,该模型与已知的神经解剖结构一致,并假设感觉管和耳石信号分别在前庭眼反射共同的运动前回路中投射到眼对侧和眼同侧细胞上。