Angelaki D E, Dickman J D
Department of Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine; Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):2113-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.4.2113.
Spatiotemporal convergence and two-dimensional (2-D) neural tuning have been proposed as a major neural mechanism in the signal processing of linear acceleration. To examine this hypothesis, we studied the firing properties of primary otolith afferents and central otolith neurons that respond exclusively to horizontal linear accelerations of the head (0.16-10 Hz) in alert rhesus monkeys. Unlike primary afferents, the majority of central otolith neurons exhibited 2-D spatial tuning to linear acceleration. As a result, central otolith dynamics vary as a function of movement direction. During movement along the maximum sensitivity direction, the dynamics of all central otolith neurons differed significantly from those observed for the primary afferent population. Specifically at low frequencies (</=0.5 Hz), the firing rate of the majority of central otolith neurons peaked in phase with linear velocity, in contrast to primary afferents that peaked in phase with linear acceleration. At least three different groups of central response dynamics were described according to the properties observed for motion along the maximum sensitivity direction. "High-pass" neurons exhibited increasing gains and phase values as a function of frequency. "Flat" neurons were characterized by relatively flat gains and constant phase lags (approximately 20-55 degrees ). A few neurons ("low-pass") were characterized by decreasing gain and phase as a function of frequency. The response dynamics of central otolith neurons suggest that the approximately 90 degrees phase lags observed at low frequencies are not the result of a neural integration but rather the effect of nonminimum phase behavior, which could arise at least partly through spatiotemporal convergence. Neither afferent nor central otolith neurons discriminated between gravitational and inertial components of linear acceleration. Thus response sensitivity was indistinguishable during 0.5-Hz pitch oscillations and fore-aft movements. The fact that otolith-only central neurons with "high-pass" filter properties exhibit semicircular canal-like dynamics during head tilts might have important consequences for the conclusions of previous studies of sensory convergence and sensorimotor transformations in central vestibular neurons.
时空汇聚和二维(2-D)神经调谐被认为是线性加速度信号处理中的一种主要神经机制。为了验证这一假设,我们研究了清醒恒河猴中仅对头部水平线性加速度(0.16 - 10 Hz)做出反应的初级耳石传入神经和中枢耳石神经元的放电特性。与初级传入神经不同,大多数中枢耳石神经元对线性加速度表现出二维空间调谐。因此,中枢耳石动力学随运动方向而变化。在沿最大敏感方向运动期间,所有中枢耳石神经元的动力学与初级传入神经群体所观察到的动力学有显著差异。具体而言,在低频(≤0.5 Hz)时,大多数中枢耳石神经元的放电频率与线速度同相达到峰值,而初级传入神经则与线性加速度同相达到峰值。根据沿最大敏感方向运动所观察到的特性,至少描述了三组不同的中枢反应动力学。“高通”神经元的增益和相位值随频率增加。“平坦”神经元的特征是增益相对平坦且相位滞后恒定(约20 - 55度)。少数神经元(“低通”)的特征是增益和相位随频率降低。中枢耳石神经元的反应动力学表明,在低频观察到的约90度相位滞后不是神经整合的结果,而是非最小相位行为的影响,这可能至少部分是通过时空汇聚产生的。传入神经和中枢耳石神经元都无法区分线性加速度的重力和惯性分量。因此,在0.5 Hz俯仰振荡和前后运动期间,反应敏感性无法区分。仅具有“高通”滤波特性的耳石中枢神经元在头部倾斜期间表现出类似半规管的动力学这一事实,可能对先前关于中枢前庭神经元感觉汇聚和感觉运动转换研究的结论产生重要影响。