Suppr超能文献

血液透析中心因促红细胞生成素α污染导致的液化沙雷氏菌血流感染。

Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections from contamination of epoetin alfa at a hemodialysis center.

作者信息

Grohskopf L A, Roth V R, Feikin D R, Arduino M J, Carson L A, Tokars J I, Holt S C, Jensen B J, Hoffman R E, Jarvis W R

机构信息

Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2001 May 17;344(20):1491-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105173442001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a one month period, 10 Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections and 6 pyrogenic reactions occurred in outpatients at a hemodialysis center.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of all hemodialysis sessions on days that staff members reported S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions. We reviewed procedures and cultured samples of water, medications, soaps, and hand lotions and swabs from the hands of personnel.

RESULTS

We analyzed 208 sessions involving 48 patients. In 12 sessions, patients had S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections, and in 8, patients had pyrogenic reactions without bloodstream infection. Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with higher median doses of epoetin alfa than the 188 other sessions (6500 vs. 4000 U, P=0.03) and were more common during afternoon or evening shifts than morning shifts (P=0.03). Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with doses of epoetin alfa of more than 4000 U (multivariate odds ratio, 4.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 12.3). A review of procedures revealed that preservative-free, single-use vials of epoetin alfa were punctured multiple times, and residual epoetin alfa from multiple vials was pooled and administered to patients. S. liquefaciens was isolated from pooled epoetin alfa, empty vials of epoetin alfa that had been pooled, antibacterial soap, and hand lotion. All the isolates were identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. After the practice of pooling epoetin alfa was discontinued and the contaminated soap and lotion were replaced, no further S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions occurred at this hemodialysis facility.

CONCLUSIONS

Puncturing single-use vials multiple times and pooling preservative-free epoetin alfa caused this outbreak of bloodstream infections in a hemodialysis unit. To prevent similar outbreaks, medical personnel should follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the use of preservative-free medications.

摘要

背景

在一个月的时间里,一家血液透析中心的门诊患者发生了10例液化沙雷菌血流感染和6例发热反应。

方法

我们对工作人员报告有液化沙雷菌血流感染或发热反应当天的所有血液透析治疗进行了队列研究。我们审查了操作程序,并对水、药物、肥皂、洗手液以及工作人员手部拭子进行了培养采样。

结果

我们分析了涉及48例患者的208次治疗。在12次治疗中,患者发生了液化沙雷菌血流感染,8次治疗中患者出现了无血流感染的发热反应。发生感染或反应的治疗与促红细胞生成素α的中位剂量高于其他188次治疗相关(6500 vs. 4000 U,P = 0.03),并且在下午或晚班期间比早班更常见(P = 0.03)。发生感染或反应的治疗与促红细胞生成素α剂量超过4000 U相关(多变量优势比,4.0;95%置信区间,1.3至12.3)。对操作程序的审查发现,不含防腐剂的一次性促红细胞生成素α小瓶被多次穿刺,多个小瓶中的残留促红细胞生成素α被汇集并给予患者。从汇集的促红细胞生成素α、已汇集的促红细胞生成素α空瓶、抗菌肥皂和洗手液中分离出了液化沙雷菌。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳,所有分离株均相同。在停止汇集促红细胞生成素α的做法并更换受污染的肥皂和洗手液后,该血液透析机构未再发生液化沙雷菌血流感染或发热反应。

结论

多次穿刺一次性小瓶并汇集不含防腐剂的促红细胞生成素α导致了该血液透析单位的这次血流感染暴发。为防止类似暴发,医务人员应遵循制造商关于使用不含防腐剂药物的指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验