Nair V, Thankappan K, Sarma P, Vasan R
Kerala Health Services, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Jun;16(2):171-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.2.171.
Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, INDIA:
Cross-sectional, community-based survey.
We selected three out of the 14 districts in KERALA: Three-hundred and twenty-six MPWs (95 male and 231 female) from 44 randomly selected primary health centres from the three districts were questioned using a structured pre-tested questionnaire that sought information regarding the provision of health services by the MPWs to eligible beneficiaries in the community. We randomly selected 90 subcentres (30 from each district) and 750 households using a cluster sampling technique, and conducted household surveys to compare the actual delivery of services at the doorstep with that reported by the MPWS: Work sampling of MPWs was also performed to examine the fieldwork time spent by them on implementing individual national health programmes. These data were supplemented with focus group discussions and personal interviews of MPWs and household members.
MPWs consistently 'over-reported' their performance when self-reported information was compared with that obtained from household surveys. Male MPWs concentrated on the National Malaria Eradication Programme and health education while female workers focused on the family welfare and immunization programmes. Key national health programmes (such as for tuberculosis and acute respiratory infection) were neglected by all MPWS: MPWs were aware of health problems of the elderly, but were not adequately trained nor officially expected to deliver any services in these fields.
Grass-root level workers apportion more time to select national health programmes to the detriment of other health programmes, thereby negating their multipurpose role. Our study emphasizes the need for interventions to derive 'multipurpose benefits' from the MPWS:
多用途卫生工作者被视为提供初级卫生保健的关键人员。我们评估了他们在印度喀拉拉邦实施不同国家卫生项目中的作用和参与情况:
横断面社区调查。
我们从喀拉拉邦的14个区中选取了3个区:从这3个区中随机选取的44个初级卫生中心的326名多用途卫生工作者(95名男性和231名女性)使用一份经过预测试的结构化问卷接受询问,该问卷旨在获取多用途卫生工作者向社区合格受益人提供卫生服务的相关信息。我们使用整群抽样技术随机选取了90个基层医疗中心(每个区30个)和750户家庭,并进行了家庭调查,以比较家门口实际提供的服务与多用途卫生工作者报告的服务情况:还对多用途卫生工作者进行了工作抽样,以检查他们在实施各个国家卫生项目上花费的实地工作时间。这些数据通过多用途卫生工作者和家庭成员的焦点小组讨论及个人访谈得到补充。
将自我报告信息与从家庭调查中获得的信息进行比较时,多用途卫生工作者始终“高估”了他们的表现。男性多用途卫生工作者专注于国家疟疾根除计划和健康教育,而女性工作者则专注于家庭福利和免疫计划。所有多用途卫生工作者都忽视了关键的国家卫生项目(如结核病和急性呼吸道感染项目):多用途卫生工作者了解老年人的健康问题,但没有得到充分培训,官方也没有期望他们在这些领域提供任何服务。
基层工作者将更多时间分配到选定的国家卫生项目上,从而损害了其他卫生项目,进而否定了他们的多用途角色。我们的研究强调需要采取干预措施,以便从多用途卫生工作者身上获得“多用途效益”: