Suppr超能文献

急性卒中治疗中的院前及院内延误。

Prehospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke care.

作者信息

Evenson K R, Rosamond W D, Morris D L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8050, USA.

出版信息

Neuroepidemiology. 2001 May;20(2):65-76. doi: 10.1159/000054763.

Abstract

Current guidelines emphasize the need for early stroke care. However, significant delays occur during both the prehospital and in-hospital phases of care, making many patients ineligible for stroke therapies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and summarize the existing scientific literature reporting prehospital and in-hospital stroke delay times in order to assist future delivery of effective interventions to reduce delay time and to raise several key issues which future studies should consider. A comprehensive search was performed to find all published journal articles which reported on the prehospital or in-hospital delay time for stroke, including intervention studies. Since 1981, at least 48 unique reports of prehospital delay time for patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack, or stroke-like symptoms were published from 17 different countries. In the majority of studies which reported median delay times, the median time from symptom onset to arrival in the emergency department was between 3 and 6 h. The in-hospital times from emergency department arrival to being seen by an emergency department physician, initiation and interpretation of a computed tomography (CT) scan, and being seen by a neurologist were consistently longer than recommended. However, prehospital delay comprised the majority of time from symptom onset to potential treatment. Definitions and methodologies differed across studies, making direct comparisons difficult. This review suggests that the majority of stroke patients are unlikely to arrive at the emergency department and receive a diagnostic evaluation in under 3 h. Further studies of stroke delay and corresponding interventions are needed, with careful attention to definitions and methodologies.

摘要

当前指南强调早期卒中治疗的必要性。然而,在院前和院内治疗阶段均出现了显著延误,导致许多患者无法接受卒中治疗。本研究的目的是系统回顾和总结现有科学文献中关于院前和院内卒中延误时间的报道,以帮助未来实施有效的干预措施来减少延误时间,并提出未来研究应考虑的几个关键问题。进行了全面检索,以查找所有已发表的报告卒中院前或院内延误时间的期刊文章,包括干预性研究。自1981年以来,来自17个不同国家的至少48篇关于卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作或类卒中症状患者院前延误时间的独立报告得以发表。在大多数报告了中位延误时间的研究中,从症状发作到抵达急诊科的中位时间为3至6小时。从急诊科抵达至由急诊科医生接诊、启动并解读计算机断层扫描(CT)以及由神经科医生接诊的院内时间一直长于推荐时间。然而,院前延误占从症状发作到可能接受治疗的大部分时间。不同研究的定义和方法各不相同,难以进行直接比较。本综述表明,大多数卒中患者不太可能在3小时内抵达急诊科并接受诊断评估。需要对卒中延误及相应干预措施进行进一步研究,并仔细关注定义和方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验