• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同剂量米非司酮单用及与双炔失碳酯联合作为紧急避孕的随机多中心临床试验

[A randomized multicentre clinical trial on different doses of mifepristone alone and in combination with anordrin as emergency contraception].

作者信息

Sang G, Shao Q, Zhang L

机构信息

Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou 310013.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):331-4.

PMID:11360607
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness and side-effects of different doses of mifepristone alone or in combination with anordrin given orally within 96 hours after unprotected intercourse as an emergency contraceptive.

METHODS

2,400 cases of healthy women were recruited and allocated randomly in 4 groups: single dose of 25 mg mifepristone, 25 mg mifepristone plus 7.5 mg anordrin, 10 mg mifepristone plus 5 mg anordrin and 10 mg mifepristone alone. The efficacy rates of contraception were estimated according to Dixon method.

RESULTS

The total expected number of pregnancy was 171.9 for 2,387 subjects enrolled in the study. The number of observed pregnancies related to method failure was 32 cases. The contraceptive effectiveness rates for the above 4 groups were 80.9%, 85.3%, 90.6% and 67.3%, respectively. For the group received 10 mg mifepristone plus 5 mg anordrin, pregnancy rate was 0.7% which was significantly lower than that in 10 mg mifepristone alone group (2.2%, P < 0.05). The incidences of withdrawal bleeding were 9.2%, 4.9%, 3.4% and 6.7% for the 4 group respectively. Two groups received mifepristone in combination with anordrin showed significant lower incidence of withdrawal bleeding than those in mifepristone alone groups.

CONCLUSION

Single oral administration of 25 mg mifepristone alone, and the combination of 10 mg mifepristone plus 5 mg anordrin were safe and effective treatment regimen for emergency contraception with no serious adverse reaction and disturbance on menstrual pattern.

摘要

目的

探讨在无保护性交后96小时内口服不同剂量米非司酮单独使用或与双炔失碳酯联合使用作为紧急避孕方法的有效性和副作用。

方法

招募2400例健康女性,随机分为4组:单剂量25mg米非司酮组、25mg米非司酮加7.5mg双炔失碳酯组、10mg米非司酮加5mg双炔失碳酯组和单独10mg米非司酮组。采用Dixon法评估避孕有效率。

结果

本研究纳入的2387名受试者中,预计妊娠总数为171.9例。与方法失败相关的观察到的妊娠数为32例。上述4组的避孕有效率分别为80.9%、85.3%、90.6%和67.3%。对于接受10mg米非司酮加5mg双炔失碳酯的组,妊娠率为0.7%,显著低于单独10mg米非司酮组(2.2%,P<0.05)。4组的撤退性出血发生率分别为9.2%、4.9%、3.4%和6.7%。两组米非司酮与双炔失碳酯联合使用的撤退性出血发生率显著低于单独使用米非司酮组。

结论

单次口服25mg米非司酮以及10mg米非司酮加5mg双炔失碳酯联合使用是安全有效的紧急避孕治疗方案,对月经模式无严重不良反应和干扰。

相似文献

1
[A randomized multicentre clinical trial on different doses of mifepristone alone and in combination with anordrin as emergency contraception].不同剂量米非司酮单用及与双炔失碳酯联合作为紧急避孕的随机多中心临床试验
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):331-4.
2
[Emergency contraception with mifepristone and anordrin].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Sep;31(9):526-9.
3
[A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study on comparing levonorgestrel and mifepristone for emergency contraception].一项比较左炔诺孕酮和米非司酮用于紧急避孕的随机、双盲、多中心研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):327-30.
4
[Low doses of mifepristone for emergency contraception].[低剂量米非司酮用于紧急避孕]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jun;34(6):335-8.
5
[Effects of mifepristone of different doses on emergency contraception, a randomized double-blind study].[不同剂量米非司酮用于紧急避孕的效果:一项随机双盲研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 May 25;83(10):813-8.
6
Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised controlled trial.三种单剂量米非司酮作为紧急避孕药的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;45(6):489-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00483.x.
7
A randomized trial of mifepristone (10 mg) and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.米非司酮(10毫克)与左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的随机试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1307-13. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146286.60138.47.
8
Mifepristone (RU 486) compared with high-dose estrogen and progestogen for emergency postcoital contraception.米非司酮(RU 486)与高剂量雌激素和孕激素用于性交后紧急避孕的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 8;327(15):1041-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271501.
9
Anti-implantation activity of antiestrogens and mifepristone.抗雌激素和米非司酮的抗着床活性。
Contraception. 1996 Oct;54(4):253-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(96)00196-5.
10
[Clinical study of emergency contraception with low-dose mifepristone].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Jan;39(1):35-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 20;1(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6.
2
Interventions for emergency contraception.紧急避孕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5.
3
Ectopic pregnancy and emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review.异位妊娠与紧急避孕药:系统综述。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1263-1266. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dd22ef.