Davis K
The Commonwealth Fund, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Urban Health. 2001 Mar;78(1):46-58. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.1.46.
Both the rising numbers of uninsured Americans and the recent presidential election have put the issue of universal health insurance coverage back on the national agenda. Lack of health insurance is a major barrier to care for 44 million Americans, and lack of high-quality, comprehensive insurance is a barrier to millions more. Universal coverage is one of the best ways to ensure that all Americans have equitable access to quality care, and it also contributes to the financial stability of health care providers, especially those in the urban safety net. A wide variety of ideas to expand health care coverage were proposed, and in some cases enacted, during the last century. At the beginning of the 21st century, the American health care system is made up of varied elements, ranging from employer-sponsored health insurance for the majority of working-age adults to the public Medicare program for the elderly. While this patchwork system leaves many Americans without health insurance, it also creates many different ways to expand coverage, including various options in both the private and public sectors. By understanding how the current health care system developed, how the various proposals for universal health coverage gained and lost political and public support, and the pros and cons of the various alternatives available to expand coverage, we create a solid base from which to solve the problem of the uninsured in the 21st century.
未参保美国人数的不断增加以及近期的总统大选,都使全民医疗保险覆盖问题重新提上国家议程。缺乏医疗保险是4400万美国人获得医疗服务的主要障碍,而缺乏高质量、全面的保险也是另外数百万美国人面临的障碍。全民医保是确保所有美国人都能公平获得优质医疗服务的最佳方式之一,同时也有助于医疗服务提供者,尤其是城市安全网中的医疗服务提供者的财务稳定。在上个世纪,人们提出了各种各样扩大医疗覆盖范围的想法,有些还得以实施。在21世纪初,美国医疗体系由多种元素组成,从为大多数适龄工作成年人提供的雇主赞助医疗保险到为老年人提供的公共医疗保险项目。虽然这种拼凑起来的体系使许多美国人没有医疗保险,但它也创造了许多不同的扩大覆盖范围的方式,包括私营和公共部门的各种选择。通过了解当前医疗体系的发展历程、全民医保的各种提议如何获得和失去政治及公众支持,以及扩大覆盖范围的各种替代方案的利弊,我们为解决21世纪未参保者的问题奠定了坚实基础。