Kee D, Karwowski W
Center for Industrial Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.
Ergonomics. 2001 May 15;44(6):614-48. doi: 10.1080/00140130110038044.
This study presents data for the joint angles of isocomfort (JAI) in sitting and standing males based on perceived comfort ratings for static joint postures maintained for 60 s. The JAI value was defined as a boundary indicating joint deviation (an angle) from neutral posture, within which the perceived comfort for different body joint postures is expected to be the same. An experiment for quantifying perceived comfort ratings was conducted using the free modulus method of magnitude estimation. Based on experimental results, regression equations were derived for each joint posture, to represent the relationships between different levels of joint deviation/joint posture and corresponding normalized comfort scores. The JAI values were developed for nine verbal categories of joint comfort. The JAIs with the marginal comfort levels, one of the nine verbal categories used, for most joint postures around the wrist, elbow, neck and ankle were similar to the maximum range of motion (ROM) values for these joints. However, the JAIs with the marginal comfort category for back and hip postures were much smaller than the maximum ROM values for these joints. There were no significant differences in JAI expressed in terms of the percentage of the corresponding maximum ROM values between sitting and standing postures. The relative 'marginal comfort index', defined as the percentage of JAIs for the marginal comfort relative to the corresponding maximum ROM values, for the hip was the smallest among all joints. This was followed, in an increasing order of the marginal comfort index, by the lower back and shoulder, while the marginal comfort index for the elbow joint was the largest. The results of this study suggest that static postures maintained for 60 s cause greater discomfort for the hip joint than for the other joints studied, and less discomfort for the elbow than for the other joints. The data about JAIs can be used as guidelines for enhancing postural comfort when designing a variety of human-machine tasks where static postures cannot be eliminated.
本研究基于对保持60秒的静态关节姿势的舒适感评分,给出了坐姿和站姿男性的等舒适关节角度(JAI)数据。JAI值被定义为一个边界,表明关节相对于中立姿势的偏差(角度),在此范围内,不同身体关节姿势的舒适感预期相同。使用自由模量大小估计法进行了一项量化舒适感评分的实验。根据实验结果,得出了每个关节姿势的回归方程,以表示不同程度的关节偏差/关节姿势与相应归一化舒适分数之间的关系。针对九个关节舒适的语言类别得出了JAI值。对于手腕、肘部、颈部和脚踝周围的大多数关节姿势,所使用的九个语言类别之一的边缘舒适水平的JAI值与这些关节的最大活动范围(ROM)值相似。然而,背部和臀部姿势的边缘舒适类别的JAI值远小于这些关节的最大ROM值。坐姿和站姿之间,以相应最大ROM值的百分比表示的JAI没有显著差异。相对“边缘舒适指数”定义为边缘舒适的JAI相对于相应最大ROM值的百分比,髋关节的该指数在所有关节中最小。其次是下背部和肩部,边缘舒适指数按升序排列,而肘关节的边缘舒适指数最大。本研究结果表明,保持60秒的静态姿势给髋关节带来的不适感比其他研究关节更大,给肘关节带来的不适感比其他关节更小。在设计各种无法消除静态姿势的人机任务时,有关JAI的数据可作为提高姿势舒适度的指导。