Melis P, Noorlander M L, Bos K E
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Handsurgery, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Apr 15;107(5):1201-5; discussion 1206-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200104150-00016.
In a controlled study using 15 piglets, the efficacy of skin stretching using a skin stretching device was tested by quantifying the tension decrease during skin stretching in undermined and not undermined wounds. The viability of the skin margins was examined in both situations. Thirty standardized wounds was created: around 15 wounds on one flank, the surrounding skin was undermined; whereas around the 15 wounds on the opposite flank, the surrounding skin was not undermined. The force required to close the 9 x 9 cm defect was measured at the beginning, after undermining, and after 30 minutes of skin stretching. Also examined was the wound healing after 1 day and 1 week. A tension decrease of 3.02 N (13.6 percent reduction of the total force that is required to close the wound at the beginning) was seen due to undermining the surrounding skin. Skin stretching for 30 minutes without undermining the skin showed a tension decrease of 6.10 N (26.5 percent). Therefore, the tension decrease due to skin stretching was twice as high in comparison with undermining the skin margins alone. This has been statistically proven to be significant (-d (difference) = 3.08, 95 percent confidence interval = 2.16; 4.00, p < 0.001). When the undermined skin of the wound was stretched for 30 minutes, we measured a total tension decrease of 7.60 N (34.1 percent). There was a statistically significant but small difference in total tension decrease as a result of undermining combined with skin stretching in comparison with skin stretching without undermining (-d = 1.51, 95 percent confidence interval = 0.77; 2.23, p < 0.001). Undermining the surrounding skin involved cutting musculocutaneous perforating vessels. Looking at the viability of the skin, seven wounds, all found in the undermined group, showed skin necrosis after 1 week. Excessive seroma formation was seen in all wounds around which the skin was undermined. In the not undermined wounds, there were no problems in wound healing. In conclusion, skin stretching for only 30 minutes using a skin stretching device significantly reduces wound closing tension. The additional advantage of skin stretching over that of undermining alone is clearly shown. Undermining the wound margins before skin stretching gives a small additional tension decrease but has well-known complications, such as skin-edge necrosis and seroma formation.
在一项使用15只仔猪的对照研究中,通过量化在潜行分离和未潜行分离伤口的皮肤拉伸过程中的张力降低情况,测试了使用皮肤拉伸装置进行皮肤拉伸的效果。在两种情况下都检查了皮肤边缘的活力。创建了30个标准化伤口:在一侧腹侧约15个伤口周围的皮肤进行潜行分离;而在另一侧腹侧的15个伤口周围,皮肤未进行潜行分离。在开始时、潜行分离后以及皮肤拉伸30分钟后,测量关闭9×9厘米缺损所需的力。还检查了1天和1周后的伤口愈合情况。由于对周围皮肤进行潜行分离,观察到张力降低了3.02牛(占开始时关闭伤口所需总力的13.6%)。在不潜行分离皮肤的情况下进行30分钟的皮肤拉伸,张力降低了6.10牛(26.5%)。因此,与仅潜行分离皮肤边缘相比,皮肤拉伸导致的张力降低高出两倍。这已被统计学证明具有显著性(差异d = 3.08,95%置信区间 = 2.16;4.00,p < 0.001)。当对伤口潜行分离的皮肤进行30分钟的拉伸时,我们测量到总张力降低了7.60牛(34.1%)。与不潜行分离的皮肤拉伸相比,潜行分离结合皮肤拉伸导致的总张力降低存在统计学上显著但较小的差异(差异d = 1.51,95%置信区间 = 0.77;2.23,p < 0.001)。对周围皮肤进行潜行分离涉及切断肌皮穿支血管。观察皮肤的活力,在潜行分离组中发现的7个伤口在1周后出现皮肤坏死。在所有皮肤被潜行分离的伤口周围都观察到了过多的血清肿形成。在未潜行分离的伤口中,伤口愈合没有问题。总之,使用皮肤拉伸装置仅进行30分钟的皮肤拉伸可显著降低伤口闭合张力。清楚地显示了皮肤拉伸相对于单独潜行分离的额外优势。在皮肤拉伸前对伤口边缘进行潜行分离会使张力有小幅额外降低,但会有诸如皮肤边缘坏死和血清肿形成等众所周知的并发症。