Karras D J, Kane D L
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 May;19(2):321-37. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70186-3.
No currently used cardiac-specific serum marker meets all the criteria for an "ideal" marker of AMI. No test is both highly sensitive and highly specific for acute infarction within 6 hours following the onset of chest pain, the timeframe of interest to most emergency physicians in making diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Patients presenting to the ED with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia therefore cannot make a diagnosis of AMI excluded on the basis of a single cardiac marker value obtained within a few hours after symptom onset. The total CK level is far too insensitive and nonspecific a test to be used to diagnose AMI. It retains its value, however, as a screening test, and serum of patients with abnormal total CK values should undergo a CK-MBmass assay. Elevation in CK-MB is a vital component of ultimate diagnosis of AMI, but levels of this marker are normal in one fourth to one half of patients with AMI at the time of ED presentation. The test is highly specific, however, and an abnormal value (particularly when it exceeds 5% of the total CK value) at any time in a patient with chest pain is highly suggestive of an AMI. There have been several improvements of CK-MB assay timing and subform quantification that appear highly useful for emergency physicians. Rapid serial CK-MB assessment greatly increases the diagnostic value of the assay in a timeframe suitable for ED purposes but unfortunately still misses about 10% of patients ultimately diagnosed with acute MI. Assays of CK-MB subforms have very high sensitivity, and, although unreliable within 4 hours of symptom onset, have excellent diagnostic value at 6 or more hours after chest pain begins. Automated test assays recently have become available and could prove applicable to ED settings. The cardiac troponins are highly useful as markers of acute coronary syndromes, rather than specifically of AMI, and abnormal values at any time following chest pain onset are highly predictive of an adverse cardiac event. The ED applicability of the troponins is severely limited, however, because values remain normal in most patients with acute cardiac events as long as 6 hours following symptom onset. Myoglobin appeared promising as a marker of early cardiac ischemia but appears to be only marginally more sensitive than CK-MB assays early after symptom onset and less sensitive than CK-MB at 8 hours or more after chest pain starts. Rapid serial myoglobin assessment, however, appears highly useful as an early marker of AMI. The marker has a very narrow diagnostic window. The clinician is left with several tests that are highly effective in correctly identifying patients with AMI (or at high risk for AMI), but none that can dependably exclude patients with acute coronary syndromes soon after chest pain onset. A prudent strategy when assessing ED patients with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs is to order CK-MB and troponin values on presentation in the hope of making an early diagnosis of AMI or unstable coronary syndrome. Although it is recognized that normal values obtained within 6 hours of symptom onset do not exclude an acute coronary syndrome, patients at low clinical risk and having normal cardiac marker tests could be provisionally admitted to low-acuity hospital settings or ED observation. After 6 to 8 hours of symptom duration has elapsed, the cardiac-specific markers are highly effective in diagnosing AMI, and such values obtained can be used more appropriately to make final disposition decisions. At no time should results of serum marker tests outweigh ECG findings or clinical assessment of the patient's risk and stability.
目前使用的任何心脏特异性血清标志物都不完全符合急性心肌梗死(AMI)“理想”标志物的所有标准。在胸痛发作后的6小时内,即大多数急诊科医生进行诊断和治疗决策所关注的时间段内,没有一种检测方法对急性梗死既具有高度敏感性又具有高度特异性。因此,因胸痛或其他提示急性心肌缺血症状而到急诊科就诊的患者,不能仅根据症状发作后数小时内获得的单一心脏标志物值排除AMI诊断。总肌酸激酶(CK)水平作为诊断AMI的检测方法,其敏感性和特异性都太低。不过,它作为一种筛查检测仍有价值,总CK值异常的患者血清应进行肌酸激酶同工酶质量(CK-MBmass)检测。CK-MB升高是AMI最终诊断的重要组成部分,但在急诊科就诊时,四分之一到一半的AMI患者该标志物水平正常。然而,该检测具有高度特异性,胸痛患者在任何时候出现异常值(特别是当超过总CK值的5%时)高度提示AMI。CK-MB检测的时间安排和亚组分定量有多项改进,对急诊科医生似乎非常有用。快速连续的CK-MB评估在适合急诊科的时间范围内大大提高了该检测的诊断价值,但不幸的是,仍有约10%最终被诊断为急性心肌梗死的患者漏诊。CK-MB亚组分检测具有非常高的敏感性,虽然在症状发作后4小时内不可靠,但在胸痛开始后6小时或更长时间具有出色的诊断价值。最近已有自动检测方法,可能适用于急诊科。心肌肌钙蛋白作为急性冠状动脉综合征的标志物非常有用,而不仅仅是AMI的标志物,胸痛发作后任何时候出现异常值都高度预示着不良心脏事件。然而,肌钙蛋白在急诊科的适用性受到严重限制,因为在大多数急性心脏事件患者中,症状发作后长达6小时其值仍正常。肌红蛋白作为早期心肌缺血的标志物曾显示出前景,但在症状发作后早期似乎仅比CK-MB检测稍敏感,而在胸痛开始后8小时或更长时间比CK-MB敏感性低。然而,快速连续的肌红蛋白评估作为AMI的早期标志物似乎非常有用。该标志物的诊断窗口非常窄。临床医生有几种检测方法能有效正确识别AMI患者(或AMI高风险患者),但没有一种能在胸痛发作后不久可靠地排除急性冠状动脉综合征患者。评估有胸痛且心电图无诊断意义的急诊科患者时,谨慎的策略是在就诊时开具CK-MB和肌钙蛋白值检测单,以期早期诊断AMI或不稳定冠状动脉综合征。尽管人们认识到症状发作后6小时内获得的正常数值不能排除急性冠状动脉综合征,但临床风险低且心脏标志物检测正常的患者可临时入住低急症医院病房或在急诊科观察。症状持续6至8小时后,心脏特异性标志物在诊断AMI方面非常有效,此时获得的这些数值可更适当地用于做出最终处置决策。血清标志物检测结果绝不应超过心电图结果或对患者风险和稳定性的临床评估。