Schoonmaker J P, Fluharty F L, Loerch S C, Turner T B, Moeller S J, Wulf D M
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center/The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2001 May;79(5):1074-84. doi: 10.2527/2001.7951074x.
One hundred forty-three Angus x Simmental crossbred steers (initial BW = 155.1 +/- 4.5 kg) were used in a 2-yr study (yr 1, n = 67; yr 2, n = 76) to determine the effects of weaning age, implant regimen, and the weaning age x implant regimen interaction on steer growth and performance, organ mass, carcass characteristics, and cooked beef palatability. Steers were early-weaned at an average age of 108 d (EW) or normally weaned at an average age of 202 d (NW) and allotted by weight to an aggressive or nonaggressive implant regimen. On their respective weaning dates, EW and NW steers were penned individually and fed a grain-based diet until they were slaughtered at a final BW of 546 kg. A subsample of steers (n = 2 per treatment) were slaughtered at 254 kg. At 254 kg, EW steers implanted with the aggressive implant regimen had 64% greater backfat depth than those implanted with the nonaggressive implant regimen; conversely, NW steers implanted with the aggressive implant regimen had 52% lower backfat depth than those implanted with the nonaggressive implant regimen (weaning status x implant regimen interaction; P < 0.01). A similar interaction was observed for empty visceral organ weights. Early-weaned steers were younger (354.7 vs 372.4 d; P < 0.01) at final slaughter but were in the feedlot longer (246.5 vs 169.6 d; P < 0.01) than NW steers, whereas the aggressive implant regimen decreased days fed (203.3 vs 212.7; P < 0.07) compared to the nonaggressive implant regimen. Overall ADG was greater for EW than for NW steers (1.61 vs 1.50 kg/d; P < 0.01) and for the aggressive compared with the nonaggressive implant regimen (1.59 vs 1.52 kg/d; P < 0.02). Early-weaned steers consumed less DM per day (7.4 vs 8.5 kg/d; P < 0.01) and were more efficient (0.217 vs 0.208 kg/kg; P < 0.02) but consumed more total DM (1,817 vs 1,429 kg; P < 0.01) than NW steers while in the feedlot. Implant regimen did not affect DMI (P > 0.37) or feed efficiency (P > 0.15). Weaning status did not affect carcass characteristics (P > 0.14), final empty body composition (P > 0.25), or final longissimus muscle composition (P > 0.18); however, steaks from EW steers had higher (P < 0.05) taste panel tenderness and juiciness ratings than steaks from NW steers. The aggressive implant regimen decreased yield grade (P < 0.02), but did not affect quality grade (P > 0.86) compared to the nonaggressive implant regimen. Placing early-weaned steers on an aggressive implant regimen is a viable management option.
143头安格斯×西门塔尔杂交阉牛(初始体重=155.1±4.5千克)被用于一项为期2年的研究(第1年,n = 67;第2年,n = 76),以确定断奶年龄、植入方案以及断奶年龄×植入方案的交互作用对阉牛生长性能、器官质量、胴体特征和熟牛肉适口性的影响。阉牛在平均108日龄时进行早期断奶(EW),或在平均202日龄时正常断奶(NW),并按体重分配到积极或非积极植入方案组。在各自的断奶日期,EW和NW阉牛单独圈养,并饲喂谷物型日粮,直至最终体重达到546千克时屠宰。选取阉牛的一个子样本(每个处理n = 2)在体重达到254千克时屠宰。在体重达到254千克时,采用积极植入方案的EW阉牛的背膘厚度比采用非积极植入方案的EW阉牛厚64%;相反,采用积极植入方案的NW阉牛的背膘厚度比采用非积极植入方案的NW阉牛薄52%(断奶状态×植入方案交互作用;P < 0.01)。在内脏器官空重方面也观察到类似的交互作用。早期断奶的阉牛在最终屠宰时年龄更小(354.7对372.4日龄;P < 0.01),但在育肥期的时间比NW阉牛长(246.5对169.6天;P < 0.01),而与非积极植入方案相比,积极植入方案减少了饲喂天数(203.3对212.7天;P < 0.07)。总体而言,EW阉牛的平均日增重高于NW阉牛(1.61对1.50千克/天;P < 0.01),积极植入方案的阉牛高于非积极植入方案的阉牛(1.59对1.52千克/天;P < 0.02)。早期断奶的阉牛每天消耗的干物质较少(7.4对8.5千克/天;P < 0.01),效率更高(0.217对0.208千克/千克;P < 0.02),但在育肥期消耗的总干物质比NW阉牛多(1817对1429千克;P < 0.01)。植入方案对干物质采食量(P > 0.37)或饲料效率(P > 0.15)没有影响。断奶状态对胴体特征(P > 0.14)、最终空腹体组成(P > 0.25)或最终背最长肌组成(P > 0.18)没有影响;然而,EW阉牛的牛排口感嫩度和多汁性评分高于NW阉牛的牛排(P < 0.05)。与非积极植入方案相比,积极植入方案降低了产量等级(P < 0.02),但对质量等级没有影响(P > 0.86)。将早期断奶的阉牛采用积极植入方案是一种可行的管理选择。