Suppr超能文献

不可触及的乳腺癌:使用11号和8号立体定位真空辅助活检装置进行经皮诊断

Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices.

作者信息

Brem R F, Schoonjans J M, Goodman S N, Nolten A, Askin F B, Gatewood O M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging and Interventional Center, George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20037, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):793-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn34793.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) devices and to correlate lesion diameter and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis at SVAB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 22-month period, 489 SVAB procedures were performed with an 11-gauge probe and 305 with an 8-gauge probe. SVAB and surgical pathologic results of 104 breast carcinomas were reviewed and correlated with lesion size, number of specimens obtained, and type of SVAB probe used.

RESULTS

Four of 38 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions diagnosed with 11-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery, whereas one of 23 DCIS lesions diagnosed with 8-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery (P =.6). A mean of 12 specimens per lesion were obtained in each group. In lesions 30 mm or larger, the underestimation rate for DCIS was 43% (three of seven) with 11-gauge SVAB and 17% (one of six) with 8-gauge SVAB (P =.6). Overall, the rate of underestimation for DCIS was significantly higher in lesions 30 mm or larger (four of 13) than in smaller lesions (one of 48, P =.006).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated no difference in breast cancer diagnosis with the 8- and 11-gauge SVAB systems, but the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis was greater in lesions smaller than 30 mm than in larger lesions.

摘要

目的

比较11号和8号立体定位真空辅助活检(SVAB)设备诊断浸润性乳腺癌的准确性,并将病变直径与SVAB时乳腺癌诊断的准确性相关联。

材料与方法

在22个月的时间里,使用11号探头进行了489例SVAB操作,使用8号探头进行了305例。回顾了104例乳腺癌的SVAB和手术病理结果,并将其与病变大小、获取的标本数量以及所使用的SVAB探头类型相关联。

结果

11号SVAB诊断的38例导管原位癌(DCIS)病变中有4例在手术时显示有浸润,而8号SVAB诊断的23例DCIS病变中有1例在手术时显示有浸润(P = 0.6)。每组每个病变平均获取12个标本。在30毫米或更大的病变中,11号SVAB诊断DCIS的低估率为43%(7例中的3例),8号SVAB为17%(6例中的1例)(P = 0.6)。总体而言,30毫米或更大病变中DCIS的低估率(13例中的4例)明显高于较小病变(48例中的1例,P = 0.006)。

结论

本研究表明8号和11号SVAB系统在乳腺癌诊断方面没有差异,但小于30毫米的病变中乳腺癌诊断的准确性高于较大病变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验