Zaza A, Lombardi F
Cardiovasc Res. 2001 Jun;50(3):434-42. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00240-1.
Clinical indexes of autonomic activity are based on the analysis of sinus cycle length and of its variability. A common assumption underlying this practice is that neural activity and cycle length may be linearly related. Recent experimental evidence suggests that such an assumption may not be correct; indeed, the relation linking autonomic agonist concentration to cycle length was found to be strongly non-linear in single sinoatrial myocytes. In the present work, we (i) test compatibility of non-linearity of neural modulation of cycle length (CL) with previous experimental and clinical observations; (ii) evaluate its implications for what concerns the interpretation of time- and frequency-domain parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS).
Non-linearity of neural modulation of CL may result in an intrinsic rate-dependency of autonomic indexes, with the exception of normalised frequency-domain indexes (e.g. the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio), which appear to be devoid of intrinsic rate-dependency. This characteristic may not limit the value of HRV indexes and BRS in risk stratification, but has to be taken into account in their pathophysiological interpretation.
自主神经活动的临床指标基于对窦性周期长度及其变异性的分析。这种做法背后的一个常见假设是神经活动与周期长度可能呈线性相关。最近的实验证据表明,这种假设可能不正确;事实上,在单个窦房结心肌细胞中发现自主神经激动剂浓度与周期长度之间的关系是强烈非线性的。在本研究中,我们(i)测试周期长度(CL)的神经调节非线性与先前实验和临床观察结果的兼容性;(ii)评估其对心率变异性(HRV)和压力反射敏感性(BRS)的时域和频域参数解释的影响。
CL的神经调节非线性可能导致自主神经指标存在内在的心率依赖性,但归一化频域指标(如低频/高频(LF/HF)比值)除外,这些指标似乎不存在内在的心率依赖性。这一特性可能不会限制HRV指标和BRS在风险分层中的价值,但在对其进行病理生理学解释时必须予以考虑。