Sherry J E, Oehrlein K M, Hegge K S, Morgan B J
4176 Medical Sciences Center, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706-1532, USA.
Phys Ther. 2001 Jun;81(6):1183-91.
Based on changes in skin temperature alone, some authors have proposed that postganglionic sympathetic vasoconstrictor fibers can be stimulated transcutaneously. Our goal was to determine the effects of low-frequency (2 bursts per second), burst-mode transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on calf vascular resistance, a more direct marker of sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow than skin temperature, in subjects with no known pathology.
Fourteen women and 6 men (mean age=31 years, SD=13, range=18-58) participated in this study.
Calf blood flow, arterial pressure, and skin temperature were measured while TENS was applied over the common peroneal and tibial nerves.
Blood flow immediately following stimulation was not affected by TENS applied just under or just above the threshold for muscle contraction. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied at 25% above the motor threshold caused a transient increase in calf blood flow. Regardless of stimulation intensity, TENS had no effect on arterial pressure; therefore, calf vascular resistance decreased only during the trial that was 25% above the motor threshold. Regardless of stimulation intensity, TENS failed to alter dorsal or plantar skin temperature.
These results demonstrate that the effects of TENS on circulation depend on stimulation intensity. When the intensity was sufficient to cause a moderate muscle contraction, a transient, local increase in blood flow occurred. Cooling of the dorsal and plantar skin occurred in both the stimulated and control legs, most likely because skin temperature acclimatized to ambient room temperature, rather than because of any effect of TENS on circulation. The data, therefore, call into question the idea that postganglionic sympathetic efferent fibers are stimulated when TENS is applied at clinically relevant intensities to people without symptoms of cardiovascular or neuromuscular pathology.
基于单纯皮肤温度的变化,一些作者提出节后交感缩血管纤维可经皮刺激。我们的目标是确定低频(每秒2次脉冲)、脉冲模式经皮电神经刺激(TENS)对无已知病理状况受试者小腿血管阻力的影响,小腿血管阻力是比皮肤温度更直接的交感缩血管传出指标。
14名女性和6名男性(平均年龄 = 31岁,标准差 = 13,范围 = 18 - 58岁)参与了本研究。
在腓总神经和胫神经上施加TENS时,测量小腿血流量、动脉压和皮肤温度。
刺激后即刻的血流量不受刚好低于或高于肌肉收缩阈值的TENS影响。在高于运动阈值25%时施加经皮电神经刺激会导致小腿血流量短暂增加。无论刺激强度如何,TENS对动脉压均无影响;因此,仅在高于运动阈值25%的试验中,小腿血管阻力降低。无论刺激强度如何,TENS均未能改变背侧或足底皮肤温度。
这些结果表明,TENS对循环的影响取决于刺激强度。当强度足以引起适度肌肉收缩时,会出现血流量短暂的局部增加。刺激腿和对照腿的背侧和足底皮肤均出现降温,最可能的原因是皮肤温度适应了室内环境温度,而非TENS对循环有任何影响。因此,这些数据对以下观点提出了质疑,即当对无心血管或神经肌肉病理症状的人以临床相关强度施加TENS时,节后交感传出纤维会受到刺激。