Leal C, Henrique R, Monteiro P, Lopes C, Bento M J, De Sousa C P, Lopes P, Olson S, Silva M D, Page D L
Department of Pathology and Epidemiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Centro Regional do Porto, Portugal.
Hum Pathol. 2001 May;32(5):487-93. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.24327.
Apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (ADCIS) has been called a special type of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) because the histologic grading is considered difficult using the classification schemes that have been proposed for common DCIS. However, ADCIS encompasses a spectrum of lesions with different morphologic aspects ranging from minimally atypical to overtly malignant. To define a classification scheme for ADCIS, 35 cases (22 pure and 13 associated with invasive carcinoma) were selected on the basis of conventional morphology on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections. Each case was assigned to 1 of 3 histologic grades (low, intermediate, and high) based on nuclear morphology and the presence of necrosis. In addition, the expression of hormone receptors p53, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, and Ki-67 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and the DNA ploidy was determined by image cytometry. Fifteen cases were classified as high histologic grade, 10 as low histologic grade, and the other 10 as intermediate grade. All but 4 cases, irrespective of grade, had the same hormonal immunophenotype: androgen receptor positivity (97.1%) and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negativity (94.3% and 97.1% respectively). Twenty-one cases (61.8%) showed p53 expression, and 47.1% of the cases were positive for c-erbB-2. The median positivity for Ki-67 was 5.2%. ADCIS has a unique morphologic and hormonal profile, distinct from common DCIS, deserving a specific classification. The proposed classification scheme allows for categorization of ADCIS according to the most important morphologic features already seen in common DCIS, ie, nuclear grade and necrosis. The expression of biologic markers other than hormonal receptors and bcl2 in ADCIS seems in general to be similar to that in common DCIS. Ki-67 and c-erbB-2 are expressed more frequently in intermediate and high histologic grade ADCIS.
大汗腺导管原位癌(ADCIS)被认为是一种特殊类型的导管原位癌(DCIS),因为使用已提出的普通DCIS分类方案进行组织学分级被认为很困难。然而,ADCIS涵盖了一系列具有不同形态学特征的病变,从轻度非典型到明显恶性。为了定义ADCIS的分类方案,基于苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色切片的传统形态学,选择了35例病例(22例纯合子和13例与浸润性癌相关)。根据核形态和坏死情况,将每个病例分为3个组织学分级(低、中、高)中的1级。此外,通过免疫组织化学评估激素受体p53、bcl-2、c-erbB-2和Ki-67的表达,并通过图像细胞术确定DNA倍体。15例被分类为高组织学分级,10例为低组织学分级,其他10例为中分级。除4例病例外,无论分级如何,所有病例都具有相同的激素免疫表型:雄激素受体阳性(97.1%)和雌激素受体及孕激素受体阴性(分别为94.3%和97.1%)。21例病例(61.8%)显示p53表达,47.1%的病例c-erbB-2阳性。Ki-67的中位阳性率为5.2%。ADCIS具有独特的形态学和激素特征,与普通DCIS不同,值得进行特定分类。所提出的分类方案允许根据普通DCIS中已观察到的最重要形态学特征,即核分级和坏死,对ADCIS进行分类。ADCIS中除激素受体和bcl2以外的生物标志物的表达似乎总体上与普通DCIS相似。Ki-67和c-erbB-2在中、高组织学分级的ADCIS中表达更频繁。