Henry J G, Prasad D
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A4.
Water Sci Technol. 2000;41(3):239-46.
The present study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the sulphate-reduction pathway in the anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate. The effects of several COD/SO4 ratios (keeping COD constant) and loadings on anaerobic filter performance were studied and compared with the results from anaerobic filters which followed the methanogenic pathway. Results indicated that the treatability of leachate by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) was dependent upon the leachate strength. With high strength leachate (COD = 15,000 mg/L) from the Keele Valley Landfill, it was found that at lower COD/SO4 ratios (< or = 1.6) toxic conditions developed in the system that were more inhibitory to the SRB than to the methane producing bacteria (MPB). As the COD/SO4 ratio increased, methanogenesis predominated. No predominance of SRB occurred at any COD/SO4 ratio with high strength leachate. The highest COD removal achieved was about 70% of which 20% was accomplished by the SRB at a COD/SO4 ratio of 1.6 and an organic loading rate (OLR) of 4 kg COD/m3.d. With low strength leachate (COD = 1500-3300 mg/L) from the Brock West Landfill, and a COD/SO4 ratio < or = 1, SRB became predominant. In these anaerobic filters in which SRB were predominant, the SRB reduced the COD as well as the MPB could. Sulphide inhibition did not take place at any loading in units treating low strength leachate. Consequently, both SRB and MPB should function at COD/SO4 ratios between 1 and 3. About 60% COD removal was achieved at a loading of 2.8 kg COD/m3.d and a COD/SO4 ratio of 1.0. However at a loading of 6 kg COD/m3.d only 27% COD removal was achieved, all of it through the sulphate-reduction pathway. These OLR values are comparable to those applied in systems where methanogenesis was dominant. It was also observed that once the methanogens were established in the units, it was not possible to displace them completely. However, where methanogenesis had not been previously established, it was found that sulphate-reduction could be the sole pathway for COD removal. From this study, it can be concluded that there is no advantage to the sulphate-reduction pathway in the anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate. The other options for increasing the loadings, i.e. the use of high surface/volume filter media (to achieve higher biomass concentrations) or high rate systems are likely to be more successful.
本研究旨在调查硫酸盐还原途径在垃圾渗滤液厌氧处理中的有效性。研究了几种COD/SO4比率(保持COD恒定)和负荷对厌氧滤池性能的影响,并与遵循产甲烷途径的厌氧滤池结果进行了比较。结果表明,硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)对渗滤液的可处理性取决于渗滤液强度。对于基尔谷垃圾填埋场的高强度渗滤液(COD = 15,000 mg/L),发现在较低的COD/SO4比率(≤1.6)时,系统中会形成有毒条件,对SRB的抑制作用比对产甲烷菌(MPB)更强。随着COD/SO4比率的增加,产甲烷作用占主导。对于高强度渗滤液,在任何COD/SO4比率下SRB都不会占主导。实现的最高COD去除率约为70%,其中20%是在COD/SO4比率为1.6和有机负荷率(OLR)为4 kg COD/m³·d时由SRB完成的。对于布罗克韦斯特垃圾填埋场的低强度渗滤液(COD = 1500 - 3300 mg/L)且COD/SO4比率≤1时,SRB占主导。在这些以SRB为主导的厌氧滤池中,SRB对COD的去除效果与MPB相当。在处理低强度渗滤液的装置中,任何负荷下都未发生硫化物抑制。因此,SRB和MPB在COD/SO4比率为1至3之间都应发挥作用。在负荷为2.8 kg COD/m³·d和COD/SO4比率为1.0时,实现了约60%的COD去除。然而,在负荷为6 kg COD/m³·d时,仅实现了27%的COD去除,且全部通过硫酸盐还原途径。这些OLR值与产甲烷作用占主导的系统中应用的值相当。还观察到,一旦在装置中建立了产甲烷菌,就不可能将它们完全取代。然而,在之前未建立产甲烷作用的情况下,发现硫酸盐还原可能是COD去除的唯一途径。从这项研究可以得出结论,在垃圾渗滤液的厌氧处理中,硫酸盐还原途径没有优势。增加负荷的其他选择,即使用高比表面积/体积的过滤介质(以实现更高的生物量浓度)或高速率系统可能会更成功。