Suppr超能文献

一种用于新生儿快速直肠温度测量的新型温度计的精确度。

Precision of a new thermometer for rapid rectal temperature measurement in neonates.

作者信息

Dollberg S, Lahav S, Mimouni F B

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2001;18(2):103-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13636.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of a Penguin electronic thermometer compared with a mercury-in-glass thermometer for rectal thermometry in newborns. The mercury-in-glass thermometer is considered the "gold-standard" for rectal thermometry. Unfortunately, accurate measurement with a mercury-in-glass thermometer requires at least 4 minutes. Rectal temperature was obtained in 224 term and near-term infants using a mercury-in-glass and a Penguin thermometers. Paired t-test was used to test the difference between the means, and F-test was used to test the difference between the variances of the two instruments. One hundred and sixty-one of the temperature measurements (72%) taken with the Penguin thermometer were within +/-0.2 degrees C and 208 (93%) within +/-0.5 degrees C from the measurements made with the mercury-in-glass thermometer. The differences in means and in variances were not significantly different between the instruments. The Penguin thermometer is an accurate and reproducible tool for measuring rectal temperature in term and near-term infants compared with the mercury-in-glass thermometer.

摘要

本文的目的是评估企鹅牌电子体温计与玻璃水银体温计在新生儿直肠测温方面的准确性和可重复性。玻璃水银体温计被认为是直肠测温的“金标准”。不幸的是,使用玻璃水银体温计进行准确测量至少需要4分钟。使用玻璃水银体温计和企鹅牌体温计对224名足月儿和近足月儿进行了直肠温度测量。采用配对t检验来检验均值之间的差异,采用F检验来检验两种仪器方差之间的差异。与玻璃水银体温计的测量结果相比,企鹅牌体温计所测温度中有161次(72%)在±0.2摄氏度范围内,208次(93%)在±0.5摄氏度范围内。两种仪器在均值和方差上的差异均无统计学意义。与玻璃水银体温计相比,企鹅牌体温计是一种用于测量足月儿和近足月儿直肠温度的准确且可重复的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验