Kikkawa M, Nakamura T, Sakamoto K, Sugihara H, Azuma A, Sawada T, Okuyama C, Ushijima Y, Nishimura T
Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Japan.
Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 May;28(5):593-601. doi: 10.1007/s002590100487.
We have developed new software which can evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic functional parameters from a quantitative gated SPET (QGS) program. To examine its accuracy, we compared these findings with the LV diastolic functional indices obtained from gated radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). Twenty-four patients were selected for this study. Gated SPET with technetium-99m tetrofosmin was performed and the QGS program was used with a temporal resolution of 32 frames per R-R interval. The LV volume of each frame was calculated and four harmonics of Fourier series were retained for the analysis of the LV volume curve. From this fitted curve and its first derivative curve, we derived LV systolic functional indices, e.g. ejection fraction (EF), peak ejection rate (PER) and time to PER (TPER), as well as LV diastolic functional variables, e.g. 1/3 filling fraction (1/3 FF), peak filling rate (PFR) and time to PFR (TPFR). Within 5+/-2 days, gated RNV was performed and diastolic functional parameters were determined by the same method. No significant difference was observed between the variables calculated by gated SPET and by gated RNV. There was a good correlation between EF, PER, TPER, 1/3 FF, PFR and TPFR determined by these two methods (EF: r=0.95, P<0.0001; PER: r=0.87, P<0.0001; TPER: r=0.84, P<0.0001; 1/3 FF: r=0.87, P<0.0001; PFR: r=0.92, P<0.0001; TPFR: r=0.89, P<0.0001). Bland-Altman plots did not reveal any significant degree of directional measurement bias in any of the comparisons of gated SPET data and RNV data. It is concluded that, in addition to the conventional LV systolic functional indices, our program accurately provides LV diastolic functional parameters from gated SPET. Also, this program will be useful for detecting LV diastolic dysfunction in various cardiac diseases before LV systolic dysfunction becomes evident.
我们开发了一种新软件,它能够从定量门控单光子发射计算机断层显像(QGS)程序中评估左心室(LV)舒张功能参数。为检验其准确性,我们将这些结果与从门控放射性核素心室造影(RNV)获得的LV舒张功能指标进行了比较。本研究选取了24例患者。采用锝-99m替曲膦进行门控单光子发射计算机断层显像,并使用QGS程序,时间分辨率为每个R-R间期32帧。计算每一帧的LV容积,并保留傅里叶级数的四个谐波用于分析LV容积曲线。从该拟合曲线及其一阶导数曲线,我们得出LV收缩功能指标,如射血分数(EF)、峰值射血率(PER)和达到PER的时间(TPER),以及LV舒张功能变量,如1/3充盈分数(1/3 FF)、峰值充盈率(PFR)和达到PFR的时间(TPFR)。在5±2天内,进行门控RNV并通过相同方法测定舒张功能参数。门控单光子发射计算机断层显像和门控RNV计算的变量之间未观察到显著差异。这两种方法测定的EF、PER、TPER、1/3 FF、PFR和TPFR之间存在良好的相关性(EF:r = 0.95,P < 0.0001;PER:r = 0.87,P < 0.0001;TPER:r = 0.84,P < 0.0001;1/3 FF:r = 0.87,P < 0.0001;PFR:r = 0.92,P < 0.0001;TPFR:r = 0.89,P < 0.0001)。Bland-Altman图在门控单光子发射计算机断层显像数据和RNV数据的任何比较中均未显示出任何显著程度的方向性测量偏差。结论是,除了传统的LV收缩功能指标外,我们的程序还能从门控单光子发射计算机断层显像中准确提供LV舒张功能参数。此外,该程序将有助于在LV收缩功能障碍变得明显之前检测各种心脏疾病中的LV舒张功能障碍。