Dressler D, Dirnberger G
Department of Neurology, Rostock University, Rostock, Germany.
Eur Neurol. 2001;45(4):257-60. doi: 10.1159/000052139.
Antibodies against botulinum toxin (BT) are currently best detected by the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA). Nevertheless, the MDA still has disadvantages, so that an immunoprecipitation assay (IPA) was introduced recently. We sought to compare the results of both tests. 33 samples from patients with cervical dystonia and complete or partial BT therapy failure underwent blinded simultaneous IPA and MDA testing. 27 (82%) samples showed concordant results, 17 (52%) being positive and 10 (30%) negative for both IPA and MDA resulting in a significant association of the dichotomous test results (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.01). The other six samples (18%) showed discordant results, all being IPA-negative and MDA-positive. This excess of MDA-positive results was also significant (Sign rank test, p = 0.03). IPA and MDA results showed a very strong and significant qualitative and quantitative association. The IPA seems to be less sensitive than the MDA for detection of low BT-AB titres, but the clinical relevance of this still needs to be established. Since the IPA is simpler, faster and cheaper than the MDA and avoids sacrifice of animals, it could become the preferred BT-AB test.
目前,检测抗肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)抗体的最佳方法是小鼠膈神经膈肌试验(MDA)。然而,MDA仍存在缺点,因此最近引入了免疫沉淀试验(IPA)。我们试图比较这两种检测方法的结果。对33例颈部肌张力障碍患者且完全或部分BT治疗失败的样本进行了IPA和MDA的盲法同步检测。27份(82%)样本结果一致,其中17份(52%)IPA和MDA均为阳性,10份(30%)均为阴性,两种检测结果的二分法存在显著相关性(Fisher精确检验,p<0.01)。另外6份样本(18%)结果不一致,均为IPA阴性而MDA阳性。MDA阳性结果过多也具有显著性(符号秩检验,p=0.03)。IPA和MDA结果在定性和定量方面均显示出非常强的显著相关性。对于低BT-AB滴度的检测,IPA似乎比MDA敏感性更低,但其临床相关性仍有待确定。由于IPA比MDA更简单、快速且成本更低,并且避免了动物牺牲,它可能会成为首选的BT-AB检测方法。