De Maio V J, Stiell I G, Spaite D W, Ward R E, Lyver M B, Field B J, Munkley D P, Wells G A
Ottawa Hospital Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):602-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114302.
There is little evidence that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone may lead to the resuscitation of cardiac arrest victims with other than respiratory causes (eg, pediatric arrest, drowning, drug overdose). The objective of this study was to identify out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors resuscitated without defibrillation or advanced cardiac life support.
This observational cohort included all adult survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of a cardiac cause from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study. During the study period, the system provided a basic life support/defibrillation level of care but no advanced life support. CPR-only patients were patients determined to be without vital signs by EMS personnel who regained a palpable pulse in the field with precordial thump or CPR only and then were admitted alive to the hospital. Six members of a 7-member expert review panel had to rate the patient as either probably or definitely having an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and a rhythm strip consistent with a cardiac arrest rhythm had to be present to be considered a patient. Criteria considered were witness status, citizen or first responder CPR, CPR duration, arrest rhythm and rate, and performance of precordial thump.
From January 1, 1991, to June 30, 1997, 9,667 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were treated. The overall survival rate to hospital discharge was 4.6%. There were 97 apparent CPR-only patients admitted to the hospital. Application of the inclusion criteria yielded 24 CPR-only patients who had true out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 73 patients judged not to have cardiac arrest. Of the 24 true CPR-only patients admitted to the hospital, 15 patients were discharged alive, 10 patients were witnessed by bystanders, and 7 patients were witnessed by EMS personnel. The initial arrest rhythm was pulseless electrical activity in 9 patients, asystole in 12 patients, and ventricular tachycardia in 3 patients. One patient with ventricular tachycardia converted to sinus tachycardia with a single precordial thump.
CPR-only survivors of true out-of-hospital cardiac arrest do exist; some victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of primary cardiac cause can survive after provision of out-of-hospital basic life support care only. However, many patients found to be pulseless by means of out-of-hospital evaluation likely did not have a true cardiac arrest. This has implications for the survival rates of most, if not all, previous cardiac arrest reports. Survival rates from cardiac arrest may actually be lower if one excludes survivors who never had a true arrest. The absence of vital signs by out-of-hospital assessment alone is not adequate to include patients in research reports or quality evaluations for cardiac arrest.
几乎没有证据表明,仅进行心肺复苏(CPR)就能使非呼吸原因导致的心脏骤停患者(如小儿心脏骤停、溺水、药物过量)复苏。本研究的目的是识别在未进行除颤或高级心脏生命支持的情况下复苏的院外心脏骤停幸存者。
该观察性队列研究纳入了安大略省院前高级生命支持研究第一阶段和第二阶段中所有因心脏原因导致院外心脏骤停的成年幸存者。在研究期间,该系统提供基本生命支持/除颤水平的护理,但不提供高级生命支持。仅接受心肺复苏的患者是指被急救医疗服务人员判定无生命体征,但在现场仅通过胸前叩击或心肺复苏恢复可触及脉搏,随后存活入院的患者。七人专家评审小组中的六名成员必须将患者评定为可能或肯定发生了院外心脏骤停,并且必须有与心脏骤停节律一致的心律记录条才能将其视为患者。考虑的标准包括目击情况、市民或第一响应者进行的心肺复苏、心肺复苏持续时间、骤停节律和心率以及胸前叩击的实施情况。
从1991年1月1日至1997年6月30日,共治疗了9667例院外心脏骤停患者。出院时的总体生存率为4.6%。有97例看似仅接受心肺复苏的患者入院。应用纳入标准后,有24例仅接受心肺复苏的患者发生了真正的院外心脏骤停,73例患者被判定未发生心脏骤停。在24例真正仅接受心肺复苏并入院的患者中,15例存活出院,10例有旁观者目击,7例有急救医疗服务人员目击。初始骤停节律为无脉电活动的患者有9例,心搏停止的患者有12例,室性心动过速的患者有3例。1例室性心动过速患者通过单次胸前叩击转为窦性心动过速。
确实存在仅通过心肺复苏存活的院外心脏骤停患者;一些原发性心脏原因导致的院外心脏骤停患者仅接受院外基本生命支持护理后即可存活。然而,许多通过院外评估被判定无脉搏的患者可能并未发生真正的心脏骤停。这对大多数(如果不是全部)先前的心脏骤停报告的生存率有影响。如果排除从未发生真正心脏骤停的幸存者,心脏骤停的实际生存率可能更低。仅通过院外评估无生命体征不足以将患者纳入心脏骤停的研究报告或质量评估中。