Sennwald G
Department of Hand Surgery, Salemspital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Jun;26(3):241-6. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0578.
Many authors recommend arthroscopy for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Arthroscopy is a sophisticated investigation, which can cause damage requiring wrist fusion. It allows visualization of findings, but these are subtle and difficult, if not impossible to interpret, since the contralateral wrist cannot be used as a standard for comparison. Furthermore, not all intracarpal ligaments are directly and reliably visible through the arthroscope: for example the scaphoid-trapezial ligament which is essential for the stabilization of the distal part of the scaphoid. Therefore, it is questionable whether we can define arthroscopy as a gold standard of diagnosis just because it permits direct vision, as if what cannot be seen does not exist! Traction, mandatory for examination, induces particular stresses that may distort intracarpal motion and so-called dynamic evaluation. Each author tends to present a specific classification, rendering comprehension even more difficult. Accordingly, teaching and learning become a real challenge. Arthroscopy may be important in particular cases, but it remains only one component of a complex clinical assessment.
许多作者推荐将关节镜检查用于诊断或治疗目的。关节镜检查是一项复杂的检查,可能会造成需要腕关节融合的损伤。它能使检查结果可视化,但这些结果很细微且难以解读,甚至无法解读,因为对侧手腕不能作为比较的标准。此外,并非所有腕骨间韧带都能通过关节镜直接且可靠地观察到:例如对舟骨远端稳定至关重要的舟骨 - 大多角骨韧带。因此,仅仅因为关节镜检查能直接观察,就将其定义为诊断的金标准,仿佛看不到的就不存在,这是值得怀疑的!检查时必须进行的牵引会产生特定应力,可能会扭曲腕骨间运动以及所谓的动态评估。每位作者都倾向于提出一种特定的分类方法,这使得理解更加困难。因此,教学和学习成为一项真正的挑战。关节镜检查在某些特定情况下可能很重要,但它仍然只是复杂临床评估的一个组成部分。