Dennis D T, Inglesby T V, Henderson D A, Bartlett J G, Ascher M S, Eitzen E, Fine A D, Friedlander A M, Hauer J, Layton M, Lillibridge S R, McDade J E, Osterholm M T, O'Toole T, Parker G, Perl T M, Russell P K, Tonat K
Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PO Box 2087, Fort Collins, CO 80522, USA.
JAMA. 2001 Jun 6;285(21):2763-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.21.2763.
The Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals if tularemia is used as a biological weapon against a civilian population.
The working group included 25 representatives from academic medical centers, civilian and military governmental agencies, and other public health and emergency management institutions and agencies.
MEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to October 2000, using the Medical Subject Headings Francisella tularensis, Pasteurella tularensis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, bioterrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Review of these references led to identification of relevant materials published prior to 1966. In addition, participants identified other references and sources.
Three formal drafts of the statement that synthesized information obtained in the formal evidence-gathering process were reviewed by members of the working group. Consensus was achieved on the final draft.
A weapon using airborne tularemia would likely result 3 to 5 days later in an outbreak of acute, undifferentiated febrile illness with incipient pneumonia, pleuritis, and hilar lymphadenopathy. Specific epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological findings should lead to early suspicion of intentional tularemia in an alert health system; laboratory confirmation of agent could be delayed. Without treatment, the clinical course could progress to respiratory failure, shock, and death. Prompt treatment with streptomycin, gentamicin, doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin is recommended. Prophylactic use of doxycycline or ciprofloxacin may be useful in the early postexposure period.
民用生物防御工作组已制定基于共识的建议,内容涉及如果土拉菌病被用作针对平民的生物武器,医疗和公共卫生专业人员应采取的措施。
该工作组包括来自学术医疗中心、民用和军事政府机构以及其他公共卫生和应急管理机构的25名代表。
使用医学主题词“土拉弗朗西斯菌”“土拉巴斯德菌”“生物武器”“生物恐怖主义”“生物恐怖”“生物战”和“生物战争”,检索了1966年1月至2000年10月的MEDLINE数据库。对这些参考文献的回顾促使找出了1966年之前发表的相关材料。此外,参与者还找出了其他参考文献和来源。
工作组的成员对综合了在正式证据收集过程中获得的信息的声明的三个正式草案进行了审查。最终草案达成了共识。
使用空气传播的土拉菌病的武器可能会在3至5天后导致急性、未分化的发热性疾病爆发,并伴有初期肺炎、胸膜炎和肺门淋巴结病。在警惕的卫生系统中,特定的流行病学、临床和微生物学发现应能引发对故意传播土拉菌病的早期怀疑;病原体的实验室确认可能会延迟。未经治疗,临床病程可能会发展为呼吸衰竭、休克和死亡。建议立即用链霉素、庆大霉素、强力霉素或环丙沙星进行治疗。在接触后的早期阶段预防性使用强力霉素或环丙沙星可能会有帮助。