Reddy P S, Reddy Y C, Srinath S, Khanna S, Sheshadri S P, Girimaji S R
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Hosur Road, Bangalore-560 029, India.
Can J Psychiatry. 2001 May;46(4):346-51. doi: 10.1177/070674370104600406.
To determine whether juvenile obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is familial and whether the rate of Tourette syndrome (TS) and tic disorders is higher among relatives of patients with OCD than among relatives of controls subjects.
We assessed first-degree relatives of 35 juvenile OCD probands (aged 16 years or less) and 34 matched, psychiatrically unaffected control subjects, using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-Revised (DICA-R) (unpublished), a Questionnaire for tic disorders, the Children's Version of Leyton's Obsessional Inventory (CV-LOI), and the Children's Version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). Similarly, we assessed adult relatives, using the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), Leyton's Obsessional Inventory (LOI), the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and a Questionnaire for tic disorders. The diagnoses were determined by consensus, using DSM-III-R criteria. We calculated age-corrected morbid risk, using Weinberg's method.
The morbid risk for OCD among the relatives of OCD probands was 4.96%, while none of the relatives of unaffected control subjects had OCD. We did not diagnose TS in any of the relatives of either OCD probands or control subjects. We diagnosed chronic motor tic disorders in only 1 of the relatives of OCD probands, while none of the relatives of control subjects had any tic disorder.
Most juvenile cases of OCD are nonfamilial and unrelated to tic disorders, while only a few are familial. There is a need to re-examine the issue of familiality in cases of OCD, as well as its relation to TS, using larger community samples to better understand the hypotheses of familial transmission and comorbidity with tic disorders.
确定青少年强迫症(OCD)是否具有家族性,以及强迫症患者亲属中抽动秽语综合征(TS)和抽动障碍的发病率是否高于对照受试者的亲属。
我们使用修订版儿童及青少年诊断访谈(DICA-R)(未发表)、抽动障碍问卷、莱顿强迫观念量表儿童版(CV-LOI)和耶鲁-布朗强迫量表儿童版(CY-BOCS),对35名青少年强迫症先证者(年龄16岁及以下)和34名匹配的、无精神疾病的对照受试者的一级亲属进行了评估。同样,我们使用神经精神病学临床评估量表(SCAN)、莱顿强迫观念量表(LOI)、耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)和抽动障碍问卷对成年亲属进行了评估。诊断根据共识,采用DSM-III-R标准确定。我们使用温伯格方法计算年龄校正后的发病风险。
强迫症先证者亲属中强迫症的发病风险为4.96%,而未受影响的对照受试者亲属中无人患有强迫症。我们在强迫症先证者或对照受试者的任何亲属中均未诊断出抽动秽语综合征。我们仅在一名强迫症先证者的亲属中诊断出慢性运动抽动障碍,而对照受试者的亲属中无人患有任何抽动障碍。
大多数青少年强迫症病例是非家族性的,与抽动障碍无关,只有少数是家族性的。有必要使用更大的社区样本重新审视强迫症的家族性问题及其与抽动秽语综合征的关系,以更好地理解家族传播和与抽动障碍共病的假设。