Numico G, Russi E, Merlano M
Medical Oncology Unit, S. Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Lung Cancer. 2001 Jun;32(3):213-26. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00222-1.
Best Supportive Care (BSC) is the treatment of choice when cure is not achievable with anticancer treatments and involves management of disease-related symptoms. In the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy has for a long time been the cornerstone of symptom management, although the best schedule is still to be defined. Chemotherapy, on the other hand, has been excluded from classical definitions of BSC and has been reserved only for selected patient populations in which a survival benefit was demonstrated using cisplatin-based regimens. We reviewed randomized trials on both palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in order to assess the impact of anticancer treatments on quality of life in advanced NSCLC patients. While no randomized trials compared radiation therapy with a control arm not including it, several randomized trials assessed the use of different schedules. Hypofractionated schedules seem to have comparable palliative activity when compared with the standard fractionated regimens, at least in metastatic, poor-prognosis patients. In locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC higher radiation doses administered with conventional fractionation achieve better results in terms of local control and survival. The rate of palliation of local symptoms is high, being 60-80% for chest pain and hemoptysis, while breathlessness and cough are controlled at a somewhat lower rate (50-70%). General symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, and depression) are affected in a minority of patients. Chemotherapy was compared with BSC in several randomized trials, in some of which an analysis of the quality of life was included. Results are consistent in favor of its palliative role and, when local symptom control is assessed, rates of palliation seem similar to those achieved by radiation. Benefits apply to metastatic NSCLC patients with good performance status, low body weight loss, age below 70-75. However, some studies support the use of chemotherapy also in patients with poor prognostic features. A comparison in terms of quality of life and symptom palliation between different chemotherapy regimens is the object of few trials. Both chemotherapy and radiation have an important role in the palliative treatment of advanced NSCLC patients and should be included in BSC programs. Future randomized trials should assess the best way of combining these two approaches.
当抗癌治疗无法治愈时,最佳支持治疗(BSC)是首选的治疗方法,包括对与疾病相关症状的管理。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的姑息治疗中,放射治疗长期以来一直是症状管理的基石,尽管最佳方案仍有待确定。另一方面,化疗已被排除在BSC的经典定义之外,仅保留给使用基于顺铂的方案证明有生存获益的特定患者群体。我们回顾了关于姑息性放疗和化疗的随机试验,以评估抗癌治疗对晚期NSCLC患者生活质量的影响。虽然没有随机试验将放疗与不包括放疗的对照组进行比较,但有几项随机试验评估了不同方案的使用。与标准分割方案相比,短程分割方案似乎具有相当的姑息活性,至少在转移性、预后不良的患者中如此。在局部晚期、无法手术的NSCLC中,采用常规分割给予更高的放射剂量在局部控制和生存方面能取得更好的结果。局部症状的缓解率很高,胸痛和咯血的缓解率为60%-80%,而呼吸困难和咳嗽的控制率略低(50%-70%)。少数患者的一般症状(疲劳、厌食和抑郁)会受到影响。在几项随机试验中,将化疗与BSC进行了比较,其中一些试验包括了生活质量分析。结果一致支持其姑息作用,并且在评估局部症状控制时,缓解率似乎与放疗所达到的缓解率相似。获益适用于身体状况良好、体重减轻少、年龄在70-75岁以下的转移性NSCLC患者。然而,一些研究也支持在预后特征较差的患者中使用化疗。很少有试验对不同化疗方案在生活质量和症状缓解方面进行比较。化疗和放疗在晚期NSCLC患者的姑息治疗中都具有重要作用,应纳入BSC计划。未来的随机试验应评估将这两种方法结合的最佳方式。