Anderson H, Hopwood P, Stephens R J, Thatcher N, Cottier B, Nicholson M, Milroy R, Maughan T S, Falk S J, Bond M G, Burt P A, Connolly C K, McIllmurray M B, Carmichael J
Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2000 Aug;83(4):447-53. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307.
Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The main aim of this trial was to compare patient assessment of a predefined subset of commonly reported symptoms (SS14) from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 scales. The primary end-points were defined as (1) the percentage change in mean SS14 score between baseline and 2 months and (2) the proportion of patients with a marked (> or = 25%) improvement in SS14 score between baseline and 2 months sustained for > or =4 weeks. The secondary objectives were to compare treatments with respect to overall survival, and multidimensional QL parameters. The treatment groups were balanced with regard to age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and disease stage (40% had metastatic disease). The percentage change in mean SS14 score from baseline to 2 months was a 10% decrease (i.e. improvement) for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase (i.e. deterioration) for BSC alone (P = 0.113, two-sample t-test). A sustained (> or = 4 weeks) improvement (> or =25%) on SS14 was recorded in a significantly higher proportion of gemcitabine + BSC patients (22%) than in BSC alone patients (9%) (P = 0.0014, Pearson's chi-squared test). The QLQ-C30 and L13 subscales showed greater improvement in the gemcitabine plus BSC arm (in 11 domains) than in the BSC arm (one symptom item). There was greater deterioration in the BSC alone arm (six domains/items) than in the gemcitabine + BSC arm (three QL domains). Tumour response occurred in 19% (95% CI 13-27) of gemcitabine patients. There was no difference in overall survival: median 5.7 months (95% CI 4.6-7.6) for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 5.9 months (95% CI 5.0-7.9) (log-rank, P = 0.84) for BSC patients, and 1 -year survival was 25% for gemcitabine + BSC and 22% for BSC. Overall, 74 (49%) gemcitabine + BSC patients and 119 (79%) BSC patients received palliative radiotherapy. The median time to radiotherapy was 29 weeks for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 3.8 weeks for BSC. Patients treated with gemcitabine + BSC reported better QL and reduced disease-related symptoms compared with those receiving BSC alone. These improvements in patient-assessed QL were significant in magnitude and were sustained.
300例有症状、局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)且无需立即放疗的患者被纳入这项随机多中心试验,比较吉西他滨+最佳支持治疗(BSC)与单纯BSC的疗效。分配到吉西他滨组的患者在28天周期的第1、8和15天接受1000mg/m²的治疗,最多6个周期。该试验的主要目的是比较患者对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ - C30和LC13量表中一组预先定义的常见报告症状(SS14)的评估。主要终点定义为:(1)基线至2个月时SS14平均评分的百分比变化;(2)基线至2个月时SS14评分显著改善(≥25%)且持续≥4周的患者比例。次要目标是比较两种治疗在总生存期和多维生活质量(QL)参数方面的差异。治疗组在年龄、性别、卡诺夫斯基体能状态(KPS)和疾病分期方面均衡(40%有转移性疾病)。从基线到2个月,吉西他滨加BSC组的SS14平均评分百分比变化为下降10%(即改善),单纯BSC组为增加1%(即恶化)(P = 0.113,两样本t检验)。吉西他滨+BSC组患者中记录到SS14持续(≥4周)改善(≥25%)的比例(22%)显著高于单纯BSC组患者(9%)(P = 0.0014,Pearson卡方检验)。QLQ - C30和L13子量表显示,吉西他滨加BSC组(在11个领域)比单纯BSC组(1个症状项目)有更大改善。单纯BSC组(6个领域/项目)比吉西他滨+BSC组(3个QL领域)有更大恶化。19%(95%CI 13 - 27)的吉西他滨治疗患者出现肿瘤反应。总生存期无差异:吉西他滨+BSC组患者的中位生存期为5.7个月(95%CI 4.6 - 7.6),单纯BSC组为5.9个月(95%CI 5.0 - 7.9)(对数秩检验,P = 0.84),吉西他滨+BSC组1年生存率为25%,单纯BSC组为22%。总体而言,74例(49%)吉西他滨+BSC组患者和119例(79%)单纯BSC组患者接受了姑息性放疗。吉西他滨+BSC组患者接受放疗的中位时间为29周,单纯BSC组为3.8周。与单纯接受BSC的患者相比,接受吉西他滨+BSC治疗的患者报告生活质量更好,疾病相关症状减轻。这些患者评估的生活质量改善在程度上是显著的且持续存在。