Juniper E F, O'Byrne P M, Roberts J N
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Respir Med. 2001 May;95(5):319-23. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1034.
Collection of airway calibre and beta2-agonist data in large clinical trials and epidemiological surveys is sometimes difficult and may be an inefficient use of resources. The aim of this study was to determine whether the omission of the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and beta2-agonist questions from the seven-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) alters its measurement properties and validity. In an observational study, 50 adults with symptomatic asthma attended the clinic at 0, 1, 5 and 9 weeks to complete the ACQ and other measures of asthma status. All patients completed the study and provided complete data sets. Omission of the FEV1 and beta2-agonist questions from the ACQ made minimal difference to the reliability, responsiveness, and both cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the instrument. Omission of the FEV1 question significantly lowered the summary score (P<0.001) but omission of the beta2-agonist question did not alter it (P>0.05). In group studies, both the FEV1 and beta2-agonist questions may be omitted from the ACQ without changing the validity or the measurement properties of the instrument. Lowering of the summary score by the omission of the FEV1 question means that data from this abbreviated form cannot be combined with or compared to data collected using the full questionnaire.
在大型临床试验和流行病学调查中收集气道口径和β2受体激动剂数据有时很困难,而且可能是对资源的低效利用。本研究的目的是确定从七项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)中省略一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和β2受体激动剂问题是否会改变其测量特性和有效性。在一项观察性研究中,50名有症状的哮喘成年患者在第0、1、5和9周到诊所完成ACQ及其他哮喘状态测量。所有患者均完成研究并提供了完整的数据集。从ACQ中省略FEV1和β2受体激动剂问题对该工具的可靠性、反应性以及横断面和纵向有效性影响极小。省略FEV1问题显著降低了汇总分数(P<0.001),但省略β2受体激动剂问题并未改变汇总分数(P>0.05)。在群体研究中,从ACQ中省略FEV1和β2受体激动剂问题均不会改变该工具的有效性或测量特性。省略FEV1问题导致汇总分数降低,这意味着来自这种简化形式的数据不能与使用完整问卷收集的数据合并或比较。