Vincenti F, Ramos E, Brattstrom C, Cho S, Ekberg H, Grinyo J, Johnson R, Kuypers D, Stuart F, Khanna A, Navarro M, Nashan B
University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Transplantation. 2001 May 15;71(9):1282-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200105150-00017.
The adoption of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as the mainstay of immunosuppression has resuited in a significant decrease of acute rejection and improvement of short-term graft survival. However, because of the irreversible nephrotoxicity associated with the chronic use of the CNI, the magnitude of the improvement of long-term graft survival has been more modest. Therefore, an effective immunosuppression regimen that does not rely on CNI may result in improvement of long-term outcome and simplification of the management of transplant recipients.
Ninety-eight patients of primary cadaver or living donor kidneys at low immunologic risk were enrolled in a CNI avoidance study. The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha), administered for a total of five doses at biweekly intervals; 3 gm/day mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 month and 2 gm thereafter; and conventional corticosteroid therapy. Patients who underwent rejection episodes could be started on CNI. The primary efficacy end-point was biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months posttransplant.
Biopsy-proven rejection was diagnosed in 48% of patients during the first 6 months after transplantation. The majority of rejection episodes were Banff grade I and IIA and were fully reversed with corticosteroid therapy. The median time to the first biopsy-proven rejection among patients who experienced this event during the first 6 months was 39 days. In 22 patients with delayed graft function, the proportion of patients with biopsy-proven rejection was 50% at 6 months. However in the first 2 weeks posttransplant, only 1 of 22 patients with delayed graft function developed biopsy-proven rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 96%. Only two grafts were lost secondary to rejection. At 1-year posttransplant, 62% of patients had received CNI for more than 7 days. At 1-year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine in the nonrejectors with no CNI use was 113 micromol/L (95%, confidence interval [CI], 100.7 to 125.3 micromol/L) and in the rejectors or patients with CNI use (more than 7 days) was 154 micromol/L (95% CI, 135.0 to 173.0 micromol/L). In selected patients with rejection, analysis of circulating and intragraft lymphocytes revealed complete IL-2Ralpha saturation.
This CNI avoidance study in immunologic low-risk patients, while only partially successful in preventing acute rejection, provided benefits to a sizable minority of patients who have not required chronic CNI therapy. However, wide acceptance of a CNI-sparing immunosuppression regimen may require a lower rate of acute rejection, possibly through the addition of a non-nephrotoxic dose of CNI. However, because complete IL-2Ralpha blockade was present during rejection, it can be assumed that alternative pathways, such as IL-15, may be responsible for the rejection; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide a more strategic approach.
采用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)作为免疫抑制的主要手段已使急性排斥反应显著减少,短期移植肾存活率得到提高。然而,由于长期使用CNI会产生不可逆的肾毒性,长期移植肾存活率的提高幅度较为有限。因此,一种不依赖CNI的有效免疫抑制方案可能会改善长期预后并简化移植受者的管理。
98例低免疫风险的原发性尸体供肾或活体供肾患者参与了一项避免使用CNI的研究。免疫抑制方案包括:达利珠单抗,一种与人白细胞介素-2受体(IL-2Rα)α链结合的人源化单克隆抗体,每两周给药一次,共给药5剂;前6个月霉酚酸酯3g/天,之后2g/天;以及常规皮质类固醇治疗。发生排斥反应的患者可开始使用CNI。主要疗效终点是移植后前6个月经活检证实的排斥反应。
移植后前6个月,48%的患者经活检证实发生排斥反应。大多数排斥反应为班夫分级I级和IIA级,通过皮质类固醇治疗可完全逆转。在移植后前6个月发生经活检证实排斥反应的患者中,首次发生该事件的中位时间为39天。在22例移植肾功能延迟的患者中,6个月时经活检证实排斥反应的患者比例为50%。然而,在移植后前2周,22例移植肾功能延迟的患者中只有1例发生经活检证实的排斥反应。1年时,患者存活率为97%,移植肾存活率为96%。仅2个移植肾因排斥反应而丢失。移植后1年时,62% 的患者接受CNI治疗超过7天。移植后1年时,未使用CNI的未发生排斥反应患者的平均血清肌酐为113微摩尔/升(95%置信区间[CI],100.7至125.3微摩尔/升),发生排斥反应或使用CNI(超过7天)的患者的平均血清肌酐为154微摩尔/升(95%CI,135.0至173.0微摩尔/升)。在选定的发生排斥反应的患者中,对循环淋巴细胞和移植肾内淋巴细胞的分析显示IL-2Rα完全饱和。
这项针对低免疫风险患者的避免使用CNI的研究,虽然在预防急性排斥反应方面仅部分成功,但为相当一部分不需要长期CNI治疗的患者带来了益处。然而,要广泛接受不使用CNI的免疫抑制方案,可能需要降低急性排斥反应的发生率,或许可通过添加非肾毒性剂量的CNI来实现。然而,由于在排斥反应期间存在完全的IL-2Rα阻断,因此可以推测,诸如IL-15等替代途径可能是导致排斥反应的原因;因此,加入非肾毒性免疫抑制剂,如西罗莫司,可能会提供一种更具策略性的方法。