Suppr超能文献

[局部前列腺癌适形放疗与传统放疗剂量递增的多中心研究。耐受性及生活质量的初步结果]

[Multicenter study on dose escalation with conformal and conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostatic cancer. Preliminary results of tolerance and quality of life].

作者信息

Beckendorf V, Pommier P, Carrie C, Bey P, Cowen D, Gonzague-Casabianca L, Maingon P, Horiot J C, Lagrange J L, Madelis G, Luporsi E

机构信息

Département de Radiothérapie, Centre Alexis Vautrin, 54511 Vandoeuvre lès Nancy.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2001 Apr;11(2):264-76.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety of conformal radiotherapy dose escalation up to 80 Gy for curative treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicentre trial sponsored by the PHRC include 164 patients under the age of 75 years with stage T1b-T3 N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma, between 1995 and 1998. The prostate was treated at 5 dose levels: 18 patients at 66 Gy, 28 at 70 Gy, 49 at 74 Gy, 48 at 78 Gy, 21 at 80 Gy. The acute and delayed toxicity was graded according to a multidisciplinary glossary. Quality of life was evaluated before and one year after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and additional questions.

RESULTS

89% and 55% of mild or moderate gastrointestinal and urinary adverse effects were observed during treatment, respectively. At long-term follow-up, of the 162 evaluable patients, 12.3% presented grade 2 adverse effects and 2.5% presented grade 3 adverse effects (1 case of haematuria, 2 urethral strictures, 1 bladder neck lesion) with no significant difference between the various dose levels. Two successive quality of life questionnaires were available for 119 patients: tiredness, pain and dyspnoea increased in parallel, but non-significantly in the groups receiving conventional doses or high doses. The proportion of patients reporting sexual activity without endocrine therapy decreased from 48% before treatment to 35% one year later. The proportion of patients with no clinical or laboratory signs of progression was higher in the high-dose group.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed between conventional dose levels and high dose levels in terms of toxicity or quality of life. As the adverse effects were acceptable, a randomized trial comparing 70 Gy and 80 Gy has been initiated.

摘要

目的

研究前列腺癌根治性治疗中调强放疗剂量增至80 Gy的安全性。

材料与方法

由PHRC赞助的一项多中心试验纳入了1995年至1998年间164例年龄在75岁以下、T1b-T3 N0 M0期前列腺腺癌患者。前列腺接受5个剂量水平的治疗:66 Gy组18例,70 Gy组28例,74 Gy组49例,78 Gy组48例,80 Gy组21例。急性和迟发性毒性根据多学科术语进行分级。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30问卷及附加问题在治疗前和治疗后一年评估生活质量。

结果

治疗期间分别观察到89%和55%的患者出现轻度或中度胃肠道和泌尿系统不良反应。长期随访时,162例可评估患者中,12.3%出现2级不良反应,2.5%出现3级不良反应(1例血尿、2例尿道狭窄、1例膀胱颈病变),各剂量水平之间无显著差异。119例患者可获得两份连续的生活质量问卷:在接受常规剂量或高剂量治疗的组中,疲劳、疼痛和呼吸困难同时增加,但增加不显著。报告未接受内分泌治疗仍有性活动的患者比例从治疗前的48%降至一年后的35%。高剂量组无临床或实验室进展迹象的患者比例更高。

结论

在毒性或生活质量方面,常规剂量水平和高剂量水平之间未观察到显著差异。由于不良反应可接受,已启动一项比较70 Gy和80 Gy的随机试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验