• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。145例手术经验]

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Experiences with 145 interventions].

作者信息

Türk I, Deger I S, Winkelmann B, Roigas J, Schönberger B, Loening S A

机构信息

Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Medizinische Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

出版信息

Urologe A. 2001 May;40(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s001200050463.

DOI:10.1007/s001200050463
PMID:11405129
Abstract

Encouraged by the groups in Paris, we performed 145 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies between June 1999 and the end of November 2000. The indication for laparoscopic prostatectomy is the same as for open surgery: an organ-confined cancer. Previous abdominal surgery, transurethral resection, and/or relative adiposity are not considered to be contraindications for this laparoscopic procedure. The mean operating time was 255 min; the last 60 procedures took an average of 200 min. In no case was it necessary to convert to open surgery. Worthy of note was the low blood loss of 185 ml on average so that in 98% of the patients no blood transfusion was required. After completing the learning curve, the average indwelling catheter time was only 5.5 days. The postoperative complication rate was 11.7%, consisting mainly of minor complications. Also with regard to continence and potency, the results were representative. Postoperatively, 75%, 86%, 92%, and 93% of the patients were continent after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In our opinion, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an alternative to open prostatectomy, offering a number of advantages for the patient and surgeon as well.

摘要

在巴黎各团队的鼓舞下,我们于1999年6月至2000年11月底期间实施了145例腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。腹腔镜前列腺切除术的适应证与开放手术相同:器官局限性癌。既往腹部手术、经尿道切除术和/或相对肥胖并不被视为该腹腔镜手术的禁忌证。平均手术时间为255分钟;最后60例手术平均用时200分钟。无一例需要转为开放手术。值得注意的是,平均失血量仅为185毫升,因此98%的患者无需输血。完成学习曲线后,平均留置导尿管时间仅为5.5天。术后并发症发生率为11.7%,主要为轻微并发症。在控尿和性功能方面,结果也具有代表性。术后,分别有75%、86%、92%和93%的患者在3、6、9和12个月后实现控尿。我们认为,腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术是开放前列腺切除术的一种替代方法,对患者和外科医生都有诸多优势。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Experiences with 145 interventions].[腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。145例手术经验]
Urologe A. 2001 May;40(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s001200050463.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases.
Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):46-52; discussion 53. doi: 10.1159/000049748.
3
[Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].[内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术。300例手术结果]
Urologe A. 2004 Jun;43(6):698-707. doi: 10.1007/s00120-004-0561-2.
4
[Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in prostate carcinoma. Experiences with 120 patients].[前列腺癌的腹腔镜淋巴结切除术。120例患者的经验]
Urologe A. 1996 Sep;35(5):413-7. doi: 10.1007/s001200050043.
5
Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.腹腔镜与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:单机构病例对照研究
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Jun;82(2):109-12.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Washington University initial experience and prospective evaluation of quality of life.
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):277-87. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582903.
7
Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.腹腔镜与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:单机构的比较研究
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1689-93. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000062614.56629.41.
8
Combined laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and modified belt radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.联合腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术与改良带状会阴前列腺根治术治疗局限性前列腺癌。
Urology. 1994 Apr;43(4):493-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90238-0.
9
Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的短期疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
10
[Laparoscopic vs. open surgical lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Methodological comparison].
Urologe A. 1994 Mar;33(2):128-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:莱比锡大学1300例手术经验
World J Urol. 2007 Mar;25(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0156-9. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
2
Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.强化腹腔镜培训:简化的盆腔训练模型用于尿道膀胱吻合术对学习曲线的影响
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0076-0. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
3
[Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].
[内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术。300例手术结果]
Urologe A. 2004 Jun;43(6):698-707. doi: 10.1007/s00120-004-0561-2.
4
Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy?
Curr Urol Rep. 2004 Apr;5(2):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s11934-004-0023-9.
5
[Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].[根治性前列腺切除术各种手术技术的功能结果]
Urologe A. 2003 Sep;42(9):1196-202. doi: 10.1007/s00120-003-0431-3.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.
Curr Urol Rep. 2002 Apr;3(2):152-8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-002-0028-1.
7
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术
Curr Urol Rep. 2002 Apr;3(2):141-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-002-0026-3.