Suppr超能文献

[军团菌的流行病学与实验室诊断]

[Epidemiology and laboratory diagnostics of legionellae].

作者信息

Szénási Z, Endo T, Yagita K, Veréb I, Nagy E

机构信息

Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szent-Györgyi Albert Orvos- és Gyógyszerésztudományi Centrum, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar, Klinikai Mikrobiológiai Diagnosztikai Intézet.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2001 May 20;142(20):1035-43.

Abstract

The severe pulmonary disease caused by the inhalation of the different Legionella species is called Legionella pneumonia, while the name of the pulmonary disease caused by the most common Legionella (L. pneumophila) is Legionnaires' disease. Another type of disease caused by legionellae is Pontiac fever with influenza-like symptoms. Legionella spp. are facultative intracellular parasites. They survive within both monocytes in the human organism and amebae in the environment. To prevent and control the occurrence of legionelloses, legionellae should be surveyed and detected in the environmental (water pipes, air-conditioning systems, cooling towers, respiratory equipments, etc.) and clinical (blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, abscess, etc.) samples. Laboratory diagnosis is complicated by the limitations of the available assays. Thus, it is proposed that the microbiological laboratory diagnosis should be based on the simultaneous application of at least three methods (culturing [on BCYE medium], followed by biochemical assays, serology, molecular biologic methods, such as polymerase chain reaction [PCR], direct demonstration [immunofluorescence microscopy], antigen determination are the most important ones) and on the simultaneous demonstration from three different samples (e.g. lower respiratory tract secretions, sputum, urine, blood culture, serum, moreover, water samples from all potential infectious sources, sediment of hot water tanks, as well as swab samples of faucets and shower heads). The advantage of PCR is that is gives reliable results in one day, in contrast to conventional culturing. However, its sensitivity can not be improved by increasing the sample volume, and neither can it give quantitative results nor can it produce strains for epidemiologic studies, contrary to the method of culturing. It is concluded that PCR and culturing do complement, but do not substitute each other.

摘要

吸入不同种类军团菌引起的严重肺部疾病称为军团菌肺炎,而由最常见的军团菌(嗜肺军团菌)引起的肺部疾病称为军团病。军团菌引起的另一种疾病是具有流感样症状的庞蒂亚克热。军团菌属是兼性细胞内寄生虫。它们在人类机体的单核细胞和环境中的变形虫内均可存活。为预防和控制军团菌病的发生,应在环境(水管、空调系统、冷却塔、呼吸设备等)和临床(血液、支气管肺泡灌洗、痰液、脓肿等)样本中对军团菌进行检测。现有检测方法的局限性使实验室诊断变得复杂。因此,建议微生物学实验室诊断应基于至少三种方法的同时应用(在BCYE培养基上培养,随后进行生化检测、血清学检测、分子生物学方法,如聚合酶链反应[PCR]、直接检测[免疫荧光显微镜检查]、抗原测定是最重要的方法),并同时从三种不同样本中检测到(如下呼吸道分泌物、痰液、尿液、血培养、血清,此外,来自所有潜在感染源的水样、热水箱沉积物以及水龙头和淋浴喷头的拭子样本)。PCR的优点是一天内就能得出可靠结果,这与传统培养方法不同。然而,与培养方法相反,增加样本量并不能提高其灵敏度,它既不能给出定量结果,也不能产生用于流行病学研究的菌株。结论是PCR和培养方法相互补充,但不能相互替代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验