Allen R M, Dykstra L A
Curriculum in Neurobiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3270, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Jul;298(1):288-97.
Data from rodent antinociception models indicate that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists do not produce antinociception alone or potentiate morphine antinociception, but do attenuate the development of morphine tolerance. This study examined the antinociceptive effects of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine, the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist (-)-6-phosphonomethyl-decahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (LY235959), and the glycine-site antagonist (+)-(1-hydroxy-3-aminopyrrolidine-2-one) [(+)-HA-966], alone and in combination with morphine in a squirrel monkey titration procedure. In this procedure, shock (delivered to the tail) increased in intensity every 15 s from 0.01 to 2.0 mA in 30 increments. Five lever presses during any given 15-s shock period produced a 15-s shock-free period after which shock resumed at the next lower intensity. Morphine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg i.m.) dose-dependently increased the intensity below which monkeys maintained shock 50% of the time (median shock level; MSL). In contrast, dizocilpine (0.003-0.1 mg/kg i.m.) produced only modest increases in MSL in some monkeys (three of five) at the highest dose tested. Neither LY235959 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg i.m.) or (+)-HA-966 (10-56 mg/kg i.m.) increased MSL in any monkey tested. Dizocilpine, LY235959, and (+)-HA-966, when administered in combination with doses of morphine (1.0 mg/kg, 1.7 mg/kg) that either produced no antinociception or produced very little antinociception, were all found to dose-dependently potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Importantly, although these NMDA antagonists in combination with morphine produced marked increases in MSL, these combinations did not alter response rate, demonstrating that the potentiation was not due to nonspecific motor effects.
来自啮齿动物抗伤害感受模型的数据表明,N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂单独使用时不会产生抗伤害感受作用,也不会增强吗啡的抗伤害感受作用,但会减弱吗啡耐受性的形成。本研究在松鼠猴滴定程序中,考察了非竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂地卓西平、竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂(-)-6-膦酰甲基-十氢异喹啉-3-羧酸(LY235959)和甘氨酸位点拮抗剂(+)-(1-羟基-3-氨基吡咯烷-2-酮)[(+)-HA-966]单独及与吗啡联合使用时的抗伤害感受作用。在此程序中,电击(施加于尾巴)强度每15秒从0.01 mA增加到2.0 mA,共增加30次。在任何给定的15秒电击期间,五次杠杆按压可产生15秒的无电击期,之后电击强度恢复到下一个较低水平。吗啡(0.3 - 3.0 mg/kg,肌肉注射)剂量依赖性地增加了猴子维持50%电击时间的强度(中位电击水平;MSL)。相比之下,地卓西平(0.003 - 0.1 mg/kg,肌肉注射)在最高测试剂量时,仅使部分猴子(五只中的三只)的MSL有适度增加。在任何测试的猴子中,LY235959(0.1 - 1.0 mg/kg,肌肉注射)或(+)-HA-966(10 - 56 mg/kg,肌肉注射)均未增加MSL。当与不产生抗伤害感受作用或仅产生极少抗伤害感受作用的吗啡剂量(1.0 mg/kg、1.7 mg/kg)联合使用时,地卓西平、LY235959和(+)-HA-966均被发现剂量依赖性地增强了吗啡的抗伤害感受作用。重要的是,尽管这些NMDA拮抗剂与吗啡联合使用时使MSL显著增加,但这些组合并未改变反应率,表明这种增强作用并非由于非特异性运动效应。