Suppr超能文献

氟西汀滴剂新剂型的比较生物利用度

Comparative bioavailability of a new formulation of fluoxetine drops.

作者信息

Floriddia M L, Castorina M, Drago F

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2000 Jan-Apr;4(1-2):9-13.

Abstract

Fluoxetine drops and marketed fluoxetine capsules had quite the same Cmax (50.25 +/- 4.43 vs 47.55 +/- 5.29 ng/ml), but significantly different AUC0-t (717.27 +/- 71.29 vs 644.91 +/- 78.91 ng/ml/h). Furthermore the drops were characterised by a very early Tmax (4.61 +/- 0.85 hours) with a highly significant difference in comparison to the capsules reference compound (6.72 +/- 1.23 hours). After log transformation 90% C.I. for Cmax, AUC 0-t and AUC0-. were 1.05, 1.11, 0.82 respectively. The two products, therefore, cannot be considered bioequivalent. Our results demonstrate that fluoxetine drops and capsules significantly differ for their pharmacokinetics, with an earlier Tmax and a higher AUC0-t after the administration of the drops preparation.

摘要

氟西汀滴剂与市售氟西汀胶囊的Cmax相当(分别为50.25±4.43与47.55±5.29纳克/毫升),但AUC0-t显著不同(分别为717.27±71.29与644.91±78.91纳克/毫升·小时)。此外,滴剂的特点是Tmax非常早(4.61±0.85小时),与胶囊参比制剂相比差异极显著(6.72±1.23小时)。经对数转换后,Cmax、AUC 0-t和AUC0-的90%置信区间分别为1.05、1.11和0.82。因此,这两种产品不能视为生物等效。我们的结果表明,氟西汀滴剂和胶囊在药代动力学方面有显著差异,服用滴剂制剂后Tmax更早且AUC0-t更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验