Dahms S E, Lampel D S, Kloeppel S, Hohenfellner M, Melchior S W, Müller S C, Thüroff J W
Department of Urology, Johannes Gutenberg University, School of Medicine, Mainz, Germany.
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2001(207):100-5; discussion 106-25.
The clinical impact of urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) has been a main urological topic over the past three decades. Exaggerated expectations and differing techniques with incongruent results caused a controversial appearance. However, since the UPP is the only method to measure directly aspects of the urethral closure function, all types of sphincteric urinary incontinence represent indications for this measurement. Based on long-term experience this paper aims to discuss the various complexes regarding the urethral pressure profilometry. The significance of the urethral closure function for urinary continence and the urodynamic relevance of active and passive pressure transmission are described. In addition, clinical implications in terms of therapeutic strategies to treat urinary stress incontinence with regards to a low urethral pressure profile are presented.
在过去三十年里,尿道压力测定法(UPP)的临床影响一直是泌尿外科的主要话题。过高的期望以及不同技术导致结果不一致,使其呈现出争议性。然而,由于UPP是直接测量尿道闭合功能各方面的唯一方法,所有类型的括约肌性尿失禁都是该测量的适应症。基于长期经验,本文旨在探讨与尿道压力测定法相关的各种复杂问题。描述了尿道闭合功能对尿失禁的重要性以及主动和被动压力传递的尿动力学相关性。此外,还介绍了针对低尿道压力曲线治疗尿失禁的治疗策略方面的临床意义。