Brand T, Hohmann V
Medizinische Physik, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.
Audiology. 2001 Mar-Apr;40(2):92-103.
Loudness functions of narrow-band and broad-band stimuli were measured with eight normally-hearing and eight hearing-impaired listeners using a categorical loudness scaling method. In the normally-hearing listeners, narrow-band stimuli, generally generated loudness functions whose slope increased with increasing level, whereas broad-band stimuli generated more linear loudness functions. These differences can be explained by the level dependence of spectral loudness summation, which is known to be most prominent at moderate levels. In the hearing-impaired listeners, the narrow-band loudness functions generally showed a more linear shape than in the normally-hearing listeners. A consequence of these findings might be that the optimal shape of the input/output curve of a hearing aid is affected not only by the signal power in the respective frequency channels but also by the bandwidth of the input signal. However, there were considerable differences between listeners in both groups regarding the individual shape and absolute position of the loudness functions. Therefore, no normative reference could be extracted that would allow for a quantification of the bandwidth effect on an individual basis.
使用分类响度标度法,对8名听力正常的听众和8名听力受损的听众测量了窄带和宽带刺激的响度函数。在听力正常的听众中,窄带刺激通常产生响度函数,其斜率随声压级增加而增大,而宽带刺激产生的响度函数更呈线性。这些差异可以用频谱响度总和的声压级依赖性来解释,已知这种依赖性在中等声压级时最为显著。在听力受损的听众中,窄带响度函数通常比听力正常的听众呈现出更线性的形状。这些发现的一个结果可能是,助听器输入/输出曲线的最佳形状不仅受各个频率通道中的信号功率影响,还受输入信号带宽的影响。然而,两组听众在响度函数的个体形状和绝对位置方面存在相当大的差异。因此,无法提取出规范性参考,以便在个体基础上对带宽效应进行量化。