Ortega J J, Ribera J M, Oriol A, Bastida P, González M E, Calvo C, Egurbide I, Hernández Rivas J M, Rivas C, Alcalá A, Besalduch J, Maciá J, Gardella S, Carnero M, Lite J M, Casanova F, Martinez M, Fontanillas M, Feliu E, San Miguel J F
Haematology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Haematologica. 2001 Jun;86(6):586-95.
To evaluate the impact of early and delayed consolidation chemotherapy on the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) stratified according to risk groups.
From 1989 to 1994, 195 children (< or = 15 years old) diagnosed as having ALL (ALL-L3 excluded) in 15 Spanish hospitals entered the prospective, randomized PETHEMA ALL-89 trial. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) groups according to their initial features and the rate of response to induction therapy. LR-ALL patients were randomized to receive or not early consolidation chemotherapy (C-1). After receiving C-1, IR patients were randomized to receive or not delayed consolidation chemotherapy (C-2). HR patients received C-1 and C-2 chemotherapy. Standard maintenance chemotherapy was administered to all patients for 2 years. High doses of intravenous methotrexate and 12 triple intrathecal doses were given as prophylaxis against central nervous system (CNS) disease.
The mean (and standard deviation) age was 6 (4) years and 120 patients were males. Fourteen patients had early pre-B-ALL, 149 common or pre-B-ALL, and 32 T-ALL. Complete remission (CR) was attained in 189 patients (97%), 11 of whom (6%) had a slow response. Risk group stratification after CR was: LR 89, IR 50 and HR 56 patients (including a subset of 26 patients at very high risk). Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities for the whole series were 58% (95% CI: 52-64%) and 69% (61-77), respectively, with a median follow-up of 8.7 years. Dividing the patients according to risk group, the 10-year EFS and OS probabilities in the LR group were 71% (63-79) and 86% (80-92), respectively; in the IR group 69% (57-81) and 76% (64-88), respectively, and in the HR group 30% (18-42) and 44% (32-57), respectively. For LR patients receiving C-1, EFS and OS were 79% (57-92) and 90% (82-98), respectively, versus 62% (48-76) and 66% (51-81) in patients not receiving C-1 (p= 0.06). For IR patients, EFS and OS were significantly improved in those receiving early and delayed consolidation (EFS 87% (74-88) vs. 52% (41-70), and OS 92% (87-97) vs. 61% (51-71)(p=0.036). Prognostic factors for EFS identified in multivariable analyses were: age >10 years in the LR group (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.5, p=0.01), and treatment with C-2 in IR patients (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.4-17.8, p=0.01). The CNS relapse rate was 4% for all the series (including the HR subset). Tolerance to treatment was good.
In this study, early consolidation seemed to improve the prognosis of children with LR-ALL, but differences in EFS were not significant. Delayed consolidation had a favorable influence on the outcome of IR-ALL. CNS preventive treatment without cranial irradiation was effective in all the groups of ALL patients.
评估早期和延迟强化化疗对按风险分组的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿预后的影响。
1989年至1994年,15家西班牙医院的195名确诊为ALL(不包括ALL-L3)的15岁及以下儿童进入前瞻性随机PETHEMA ALL-89试验。根据患者的初始特征和诱导治疗反应率分为低风险(LR)、中风险(IR)和高风险(HR)组。LR-ALL患者随机接受或不接受早期强化化疗(C-1)。接受C-1后,IR患者随机接受或不接受延迟强化化疗(C-2)。HR患者接受C-1和C-2化疗。所有患者接受2年的标准维持化疗。给予大剂量静脉甲氨蝶呤和12次鞘内三联注射以预防中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病。
平均(及标准差)年龄为6(4)岁,120例为男性。14例为早期前B-ALL,149例为普通或前B-ALL,32例为T-ALL。189例患者(97%)达到完全缓解(CR),其中11例(6%)缓解缓慢。CR后的风险组分层为:LR 89例,IR 50例,HR 56例(包括26例极高风险患者亚组)。整个系列的10年无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率(OS)概率分别为58%(95%CI:52-64%)和69%(61-77),中位随访8.7年。按风险组划分患者,LR组的10年EFS和OS概率分别为71%(63-79)和86%(80-92);IR组分别为69%(57-81)和76%(64-88),HR组分别为30%(18-42)和44%(32-57)。接受C-1的LR患者的EFS和OS分别为79%(57-92)和90%(82-98),未接受C-1的患者分别为62%(48-76)和66%(51-81)(p=0.06)。对于IR患者,接受早期和延迟强化的患者的EFS和OS显著改善(EFS 87%(74-88)对52%(41-70),OS 92%(87-97)对61%(51-71)(p=0.036)。多变量分析中确定的EFS预后因素为:LR组年龄>10岁(OR 3.5,95%CI 1.3-9.5,p=0.01),IR患者接受C-2治疗(OR 5.0,95%CI 1.4-17.8,p=0.01)。所有系列(包括HR亚组)的CNS复发率为4%。治疗耐受性良好。
在本研究中,早期强化似乎改善了LR-ALL患儿的预后,但EFS差异不显著。延迟强化对IR-ALL的预后有有利影响。不进行颅脑照射的CNS预防性治疗对所有ALL患者组均有效。