Douglas A, Simon T R, Goddard M
Medical Devices Bureau, Health Protection Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997 Sep;58(9):672-6. doi: 10.1080/15428119791012487.
This study evaluated changes in the tensile strength and barrier integrity of medical gloves during hospital clinical use. Nonsterile vinyl, sterile vinyl, and nonsterile natural rubber latex gloves were collected after use in a clinical setting and then tested for tensile strength, elongation, and water leakage. Tensile properties of vinyl gloves did not change during use, whereas changes in latex depended on the brand evaluated. New gloves, regardless of material of manufacture, were found to have leakage rates of 2% or less. Two brands of nonsterile vinyl gloves were found to have an average rate of leakage after use of 24 to 28% (average 26%), three brands of latex gloves of 6 to 10% (average 8%), and one brand of sterile vinyl gloves of 3%. Low-protein powderless latex gloves leaked slightly less than the powdered brands. The high rates of leakage observed for nonsterile vinyl gloves indicate that they provide less barrier protection than latex in typical hospital use. The low leakage rate observed for sterile vinyl gloves indicates that barrier durability is not solely a function of the generic polymer composition of the barrier.
本研究评估了医用手套在医院临床使用期间拉伸强度和屏障完整性的变化。在临床环境中使用后的非无菌乙烯基手套、无菌乙烯基手套和非无菌天然橡胶乳胶手套被收集起来,然后测试其拉伸强度、伸长率和漏水情况。乙烯基手套的拉伸性能在使用过程中没有变化,而乳胶手套的变化则取决于所评估的品牌。新的手套,无论其制造材料如何,漏水率均为2%或更低。发现两个品牌的非无菌乙烯基手套使用后的平均漏水率为24%至28%(平均26%),三个品牌的乳胶手套为6%至10%(平均8%),一个品牌的无菌乙烯基手套为3%。低蛋白无粉乳胶手套的漏水量略低于有粉品牌。非无菌乙烯基手套观察到的高漏水率表明,在典型的医院使用中,它们提供的屏障保护比乳胶少。无菌乙烯基手套观察到的低漏水率表明,屏障耐久性不仅仅取决于屏障的通用聚合物组成。