Chan J S, Cowie R L, Lazarenko G C, Little C, Scott S, Ford G T
Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Can Respir J. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):147-52. doi: 10.1155/2001/613426.
To compare the relapse rate after a single intramuscular injection of a long acting corticosteroid, betamethasone, with oral prednisone in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) for acute exacerbations of asthma.
Patients with acute exacerbations of asthma who were suitable for discharge from the ED were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled pilot study. At discharge, patients were randomly assigned to receive either intramuscular betamethasone 12 mg and placebo capsules, or a placebo intramuscular injection and prednisone 50 mg daily for seven days. At days 7 and 21, patients were contacted by telephone to determine relapse. Relapse was defined as an unscheduled visit to a physician for treatment of continuing or worsening symptoms of asthma.
One hundred and seventy-one patients were enrolled, of whom 87 were randomly assigned to the betamethasone group and 84 to the prednisone group. Baseline characteristics were matched evenly between the groups, with the exception of asthma duration (15.5 versus 21.2 years, respectively) and use of inhaled corticosteroids (46% versus 64.3% respectively) (P<0.05). Using intention-to-treat analysis, the relapse rates for betamethasone and prednisone at day 7 were 14.9% (13 of 87 patients) and 25% (21 of 84 patients), respectively (P=0.1), and at day 21, the rates were 36.8% (32 of 87 patients) and 31% (26 of 84 patients), respectively (P=0.4). There were no differences in symptom score, peak flows and adverse effects between the two groups at days 7 and 21.
A single dose of intramuscular betamethasone 12 mg was safe and as efficacious as prednisone in preventing the relapse of acute asthma. There was a trend toward a reduced relapse rate at seven days. In select ED patients discharged for acute asthma, intramuscular betamethasone may be an effective alternative to prednisone.
比较在急诊科因哮喘急性加重而出院的患者中,单次肌内注射长效皮质类固醇倍他米松与口服泼尼松后的复发率。
适合从急诊科出院的哮喘急性加重患者被纳入一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的试点研究。出院时,患者被随机分配接受12毫克肌内注射倍他米松和安慰剂胶囊,或安慰剂肌内注射并每日口服50毫克泼尼松,共七天。在第7天和第21天,通过电话联系患者以确定复发情况。复发被定义为因哮喘持续或恶化症状而不定期就医。
共纳入171例患者,其中87例被随机分配到倍他米松组,84例被分配到泼尼松组。除哮喘病程(分别为15.5年和21.2年)和吸入性皮质类固醇的使用情况(分别为46%和64.3%)外,两组的基线特征匹配均匀(P<0.05)。采用意向性分析,第7天时倍他米松和泼尼松的复发率分别为14.9%(87例患者中的13例)和25%(84例患者中的21例)(P=0.1),第21天时,复发率分别为36.8%(87例患者中的32例)和31%(84例患者中的26例)(P=0.4)。在第7天和第21天,两组之间的症状评分、峰值流速和不良反应无差异。
单次肌内注射12毫克倍他米松在预防急性哮喘复发方面安全且与泼尼松疗效相当。第7天时复发率有降低趋势。在因急性哮喘出院的部分急诊科患者中,肌内注射倍他米松可能是泼尼松的有效替代药物。