Janhom A, van Ginkel F C, van Amerongen J P, van der Stelt P F
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 May;30(3):166-71. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600604.
To determine a proper scanning resolution for digitizing bitewing radiographs in the detection of approximal caries.
Fifty-two premolars and 48 molars were mounted in blocks and imaged on conventional film (Ektaspeed Plus, Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY USA) simulating a bitewing projection. The 15 bitewing radiographs were then scanned with a flatbed scanner at three resolutions 150, 300 and 600 d.p.i. The digitized images were displayed in random order on a high-resolution cathode ray tube monitor. Ten observers assessed the caries status of 200 approximal surfaces. They scored lesion presence on a 5-point confidence scale and depth on a 3-point scale. The observer's scores were compared with the results from a histological examination. Data were analysed using analysis of variance, by calculating signed observer error, absolute observer error and observer confidence.
Lesion depth had a significant effect on confidence of lesion recognition. The main effect of resolution and the interaction between resolution and lesion depth were significant. Pair-wise comparison showed a significant difference between resolutions in case of sound surfaces and surfaces with dentinal lesions for absolute error. The confidence increased as the resolution increased but no significant difference was found between 300 and 600 d.p.i. The best score for depth estimation was obtained at the 300 d.p.i. scanning resolution.
When bitewing radiographs are scanned with a flatbed scanner, a resolution of 300 d.p.i. seems the best choice. At this resolution the digital file size is manageable without significant loss of the information necessary for caries diagnosis.
确定数字化咬合翼片用于邻面龋检测时的合适扫描分辨率。
将52颗前磨牙和48颗磨牙固定于木块中,在传统胶片(Ektaspeed Plus,伊士曼柯达公司,美国纽约罗切斯特)上成像,模拟咬合翼片投照。然后用平板扫描仪以150、300和600 d.p.i.三种分辨率扫描这15张咬合翼片。数字化图像以随机顺序显示在高分辨率阴极射线管显示器上。10名观察者评估200个邻面的龋病状况。他们以5分制置信度量表对病变存在情况评分,以3分制量表对病变深度评分。将观察者的评分与组织学检查结果进行比较。使用方差分析进行数据分析,计算观察者的正负误差、绝对误差和观察者置信度。
病变深度对病变识别的置信度有显著影响。分辨率的主效应以及分辨率与病变深度之间的交互作用均具有显著性。两两比较显示,对于绝对误差,在正常表面和有牙本质病变的表面,不同分辨率之间存在显著差异。置信度随分辨率的提高而增加,但在300和600 d.p.i.之间未发现显著差异。在300 d.p.i.扫描分辨率下获得了最佳的深度估计分数。
当用平板扫描仪扫描咬合翼片时,300 d.p.i.的分辨率似乎是最佳选择。在此分辨率下,数字文件大小易于管理,且不会显著丢失龋病诊断所需的信息。