Weiss M, Fischer J E, Neff T, Hug M I, Baenziger O
Research Group, Department of Intensive Care and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jul;45(6):729-33. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006729.x.
Blood sampling from arterial lines is a frequent event in anesthesia and critical care. To avoid clot formation, both the stopcock outlet and the cannula must be flushed after sampling. We investigated in a bench experiment whether fluid flow through the cannula is affected by the sequence of flushing procedures.
Continuity of fluid delivery from a vascular cannula was gravimetrically determined using two different flushing techniques with either a syringe pump flush system or a bag flush system. The procedures comprised first flushing the stopcock towards the cannula and then towards the stopcock sampling outlet or the reverse order. Experiments were repeated in triplicate and two sets for each flushing system at hydrostatic pressures of 37 mm Hg and 74 mm Hg.
The main finding of the study was that flushing the stopcock towards the outlet after flushing the cannula resulted in considerable retrograde aspiration volumes and zero flow times, in particular in combination with syringe pump flush systems. At a hydrostatic pressure of 74 mm Hg, the observed zero flow time at the cannula tip amounted to (mean+/-SD) 0.1+/-0.01 min with the bag flush system and 7.7+/-0.5 min with the syringe pump flush system. The related retrograde aspiration volumes were 2.2+/-0.7 microl with the bag system and 30.0+/-2.0 microl with the syringe pump system. No backflow was recorded when the stopcock was first flushed to ambient pressure and then afterwards towards the cannula.
Opening a flush system to ambient pressure affects the continuity of fluid delivery, particularly when using syringe pump flush systems. After blood sampling, the stopcock outlet should be flushed first followed by cannula flushing.
在麻醉和重症监护中,从动脉留置导管采血是常见操作。为避免血栓形成,采血后必须冲洗三通开关出口和导管。我们在一个实验台上进行研究,探讨冲洗程序的顺序是否会影响通过导管的液体流动。
使用两种不同的冲洗技术,即注射泵冲洗系统或袋装冲洗系统,通过重量法测定血管导管的液体输送连续性。操作程序包括先向导管冲洗三通开关,然后向三通开关采样出口冲洗,或者顺序相反。在37毫米汞柱和74毫米汞柱的静水压力下,对每个冲洗系统重复实验三次,共两组。
该研究的主要发现是,在冲洗导管后向出口冲洗三通开关会导致大量逆行抽吸量和零流量时间,特别是与注射泵冲洗系统结合使用时。在74毫米汞柱的静水压力下,袋装冲洗系统在导管尖端观察到的零流量时间为(平均值±标准差)0.1±0.01分钟,注射泵冲洗系统为7.7±0.5分钟。袋装系统的相关逆行抽吸量为2.2±0.7微升,注射泵系统为30.0±2.0微升。当三通开关先冲洗至常压然后再向导管冲洗时,未记录到回流。
将冲洗系统打开至常压会影响液体输送的连续性,特别是在使用注射泵冲洗系统时。采血后,应先冲洗三通开关出口,然后再冲洗导管。