Simeon D, Guralnik O, Schmeidler J, Sirof B, Knutelska M
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York 10029, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1027-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1027.
In contrast to trauma's relationship with the other dissociative disorders, the relationship of trauma to depersonalization disorder is unknown. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the role of childhood interpersonal trauma in depersonalization disorder.
Forty-nine subjects with DSM-IV depersonalization disorder and 26 healthy comparison subjects who were free of lifetime axis I and II disorders and of comparable age and gender were administered the Dissociative Experiences Scale and the Childhood Trauma Interview, which measures separation or loss, physical neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, witnessing of violence, and sexual abuse.
Childhood interpersonal trauma as a whole was highly predictive of both a diagnosis of depersonalization disorder and of scores denoting dissociation, pathological dissociation, and depersonalization. Emotional abuse, both in total score and in maximum severity, emerged as the most significant predictor both of a diagnosis of depersonalization disorder and of scores denoting depersonalization but not of general dissociation scores, which were better predicted by combined emotional and sexual abuse. The majority of the perpetrators of emotional abuse were either or both parents. Although different types of trauma were modestly correlated, only a few of these relationships were statistically significant, underscoring the importance of comprehensively considering different types of trauma in research studies.
Childhood interpersonal trauma and, in particular, emotional abuse may play a role in the pathogenesis of depersonalization disorder. Compared to other types of childhood trauma, emotional maltreatment is a relatively neglected entity in psychiatric research and merits more attention.
与创伤与其他解离性障碍的关系不同,创伤与人格解体障碍的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是系统地调查童年人际创伤在人格解体障碍中的作用。
对49名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格解体障碍的受试者和26名健康对照受试者进行了施测,这些对照受试者无终生轴I和轴II障碍,年龄和性别相当。施测的量表包括解离体验量表和童年创伤访谈,后者测量分离或丧失、身体忽视、情感虐待、身体虐待、目睹暴力和性虐待。
童年人际创伤总体上对人格解体障碍的诊断以及表示解离、病理性解离和人格解体的分数具有高度预测性。情感虐待,无论是总分还是最大严重程度,都是人格解体障碍诊断以及表示人格解体分数的最显著预测因素,但不是一般解离分数的预测因素,情感和性虐待综合起来对一般解离分数的预测效果更好。情感虐待的大多数施暴者是父母一方或双方。虽然不同类型的创伤之间存在适度的相关性,但只有少数这些关系具有统计学意义,这突出了在研究中全面考虑不同类型创伤的重要性。
童年人际创伤,尤其是情感虐待,可能在人格解体障碍的发病机制中起作用。与其他类型的童年创伤相比,情感虐待在精神病学研究中是一个相对被忽视的领域,值得更多关注。