Suppr超能文献

父母及医护人员对极早产儿积极治疗的态度。

Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infants.

作者信息

Streiner D L, Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf B, Rosenbaum P

机构信息

Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):152-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.152.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the attitudes of neonatologists, neonatal nurses, the parents of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) children, and the parents of normal birth weight children toward saving infants of borderline viability and who should be involved in the decision-making process and to compare physicians' and nurses' estimates of the proportion of infants who are born at various gestational ages with regard to survival, morbidity, and treatment.

METHODS

A questionnaire was given to 169 parents of ELBW children and 123 parents of term children, who were part of a longitudinal study of the outcome of ELBW infants. A similar questionnaire was completed by 98 Canadian neonatologists and 99 neonatal nurses.

RESULTS

Physicians tended to be more optimistic than nurses regarding the probability of survival and freedom from serious disabilities and would recommend to parents life-saving interventions for their child at earlier gestational ages. A significant majority of parents believed that attempts should be made to save all infants, irrespective of condition or weight at birth, compared with only 6% of health professionals who endorsed this. In contrast to parents, health professionals believed that economic costs to society should be a factor in deciding whether to save an ELBW infant. However, health professionals did not believe that the economic status of the parents should be a factor, although the stress of raising an infant with disabilities should be. Most respondents believed that the parents and physicians should make the final decision but that other bodies, such as ethics committees or the courts, should not.

CONCLUSION

Health care professionals must recognize that their attitudes toward saving ELBW infants differ from those of parents. Parents, whether of term or extremely premature children, are more in favor of intervening to save the infant irrespective of its weight or condition at birth than are professionals. It therefore is imperative that there be joint decision making, combining the knowledge of the physician with the wishes of the parents.

摘要

目的

比较新生儿科医生、新生儿护士、极低出生体重(ELBW)儿的父母以及正常出生体重儿的父母对挽救临界生存能力婴儿的态度以及应由谁参与决策过程,并比较医生和护士对不同孕周出生婴儿的生存、发病情况及治疗比例的估计。

方法

向169名ELBW儿的父母和123名足月儿的父母发放问卷,他们是ELBW婴儿结局纵向研究的一部分。98名加拿大新生儿科医生和99名新生儿护士完成了一份类似的问卷。

结果

在生存可能性和无严重残疾方面,医生往往比护士更乐观,并且会建议父母在更早的孕周对孩子进行挽救生命的干预。绝大多数父母认为应该尝试挽救所有婴儿,无论其出生时的状况或体重如何,相比之下,只有6%的医疗专业人员支持这一点。与父母不同,医疗专业人员认为社会的经济成本应作为决定是否挽救ELBW婴儿的一个因素。然而,医疗专业人员不认为父母的经济状况应成为一个因素,尽管抚养残疾婴儿带来的压力应该是一个因素。大多数受访者认为父母和医生应做出最终决定,但伦理委员会或法院等其他机构不应参与。

结论

医疗保健专业人员必须认识到他们对挽救ELBW婴儿的态度与父母不同。无论是足月儿还是极早产儿的父母,都比专业人员更倾向于进行干预以挽救婴儿,无论其出生时的体重或状况如何。因此,必须进行联合决策,将医生的知识与父母的意愿结合起来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验