Suppr超能文献

生存极限下的决策:新生儿科医生与护士之间不同的认知与观点

Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.

作者信息

Bucher Hans Ulrich, Klein Sabine D, Hendriks Manya J, Baumann-Hölzle Ruth, Berger Thomas M, Streuli Jürg C, Fauchère Jean-Claude

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.

Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants.

METHODS

All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored.

RESULTS

Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.

摘要

背景

在过去20年里,高收入国家中极早产儿完整存活的几率有所增加。对于出生在生存极限的婴儿,决定是否停止或撤销重症监护仍然是一项重大挑战。如今,医疗保健专业人员与家长之间就这些脆弱婴儿进行共同决策已成为首选模式。然而,关于应如何做出维持生命治疗的决策,以及当医疗保健专业人员与家长意见不一致时谁应拥有最终决定权,目前仍存在伦理争议。我们针对新生儿科医生和新生儿护士开展了一项调查,以分析极早产儿临终决策中的做法、困难以及家长的参与情况。

方法

邀请瑞士所有在三级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)工作至少12个月的552名医生和护士参与一项有50个问题的在线调查。探讨了新生儿科医生与NICU护士之间以及不同语言地区之间的差异。

结果

121名医生中有96名(79%)、431名护士中有302名(70%)完成了在线问卷。护士比医生更频繁地报告了以下临终决策方面的困难:决策时间不足、法律限制以及缺乏统一的科室政策。护士提及社会缺乏团结以及残疾服务短缺的频率也高于医生。在某些特定情况下限制重症监护时,护士认为停止鼻饲和呼吸支持比医生更难以接受。护士更不愿意赋予家长对其婴儿治疗方案的完全决定权。与专业类别(护士或医生)不同,语言地区、专业经验和宗教对所给出的答案几乎没有影响。

结论

在极早产儿临终决策的方式和决策者方面,医生和护士在许多方面存在差异。护士与医生之间的分歧可能源于伦理教育的差异、患者护理重点的不同以及与患者的直接接触程度。认识到这些差异对于避免新生儿团队内部以及在出生于生存极限的早产儿临终决策过程中与家长之间的潜在冲突非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f423/5822553/d3154de4eeb7/12887_2018_1040_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验