• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合戈德曼风险评分与初始心肌肌钙蛋白I对急诊科胸痛患者进行风险分层。

Combination of Goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin I for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification.

作者信息

Limkakeng A, Gibler W B, Pollack C, Hoekstra J W, Sites F, Shofer F S, Tiffany B, Wilke E, Hollander J E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;8(7):696-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00187.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00187.x
PMID:11435183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate identification of low-risk emergency department (ED) chest pain patients who may be safe for discharge has not been well defined. Goldman criteria have reliably risk-stratified patients but have not identified any subset safe for ED release. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values have also been shown to risk-stratify patients but have not identified a subset safe for ED release.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that ED chest pain patients with a Goldman risk of < or =4% and a single negative cTnI (< or =0.3 ng/mL) at the time of ED presentation would be safe for discharge [<1% risk for death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), revascularization].

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed in which consecutive ED chest pain patients were enrolled from July 1999 to November 2000. Data collected included patient demographics, medical and cardiac history, electrocardiogram, and creatine kinase-MB and cTnI. Goldman risk stratification score was calculated while patients were still in the ED. Hospital course was followed daily. Telephone follow-up occurred at 30 days. The main outcome was death, AMI, or revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stents/coronary artery bypass grafting) within 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 2,322 patients evaluated, 998 had both a Goldman risk < or =4% and a cTnI < or =0.3 ng/mL. During the initial hospitalization, 37 patients met the composite endpoint (3.7%): 6 deaths (0.7%), 17 AMIs (1.7%), 18 revascularizations (1.8%). Between the time of hospital discharge and 30-day follow-up, 15 patients met the composite endpoint: 4 deaths (0.4%), 6 AMIs (0.6%), and 5 revascularizations (0.5%). Overall, 49 patients met the composite endpoint (4.9%; 95% CI = 3.6% to 6.2%): 10 deaths (1.0%; 95% CI = 0.4% to 1.6%); 23 AMIs (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%), and 23 revascularizations (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%) within 30 days of presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of two risk stratification modalities for ED chest pain patients (Goldman risk < or =4% and cTnI < or =0.3 ng/mL) did not identify a subgroup of chest pain patients at <1% risk for death, AMI, or revascularization within 30 days.

摘要

背景

准确识别可能安全出院的低风险急诊科胸痛患者尚未得到明确界定。戈德曼标准已可靠地对患者进行风险分层,但尚未识别出任何可安全从急诊科出院的亚组。心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)值也已被证明可对患者进行风险分层,但尚未识别出可安全从急诊科出院的亚组。

目的

检验以下假设,即急诊科就诊时戈德曼风险≤4%且单次cTnI阴性(≤0.3 ng/mL)的胸痛患者可安全出院[死亡、急性心肌梗死(AMI)、血运重建风险<1%]。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,1999年7月至2000年11月连续纳入急诊科胸痛患者。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、病史和心脏病史、心电图以及肌酸激酶同工酶和cTnI。在患者仍在急诊科时计算戈德曼风险分层评分。每天跟踪住院过程。30天时进行电话随访。主要结局是30天内死亡、AMI或血运重建(经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术/支架/冠状动脉旁路移植术)。

结果

在评估的2322例患者中,998例戈德曼风险≤4%且cTnI≤0.3 ng/mL。在初次住院期间,37例患者达到复合终点(3.7%):6例死亡(0.7%),17例AMI(1.7%),18例血运重建(1.8%)。在出院至30天随访期间,15例患者达到复合终点:4例死亡(0.4%),6例AMI(0.6%),5例血运重建(0.5%)。总体而言,49例患者达到复合终点(4.9%;95%CI = 3.6%至6.2%):10例死亡(1.0%;95%CI = 0.4%至1.6%);23例AMI(2.3%;95%CI = 1.4%至3.2%),23例血运重建(2.3%;95%CI = 1.4%至3.2%),均在就诊后30天内。

结论

对于急诊科胸痛患者,两种风险分层方式(戈德曼风险≤4%且cTnI≤0.3 ng/mL)的联合并未识别出30天内死亡、AMI或血运重建风险<1%的胸痛患者亚组。

相似文献

1
Combination of Goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin I for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification.结合戈德曼风险评分与初始心肌肌钙蛋白I对急诊科胸痛患者进行风险分层。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;8(7):696-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00187.x.
2
Prospective evaluation of emergency department patients with potential coronary syndromes using initial absolute CK-MB vs. CK-MB relative index.使用初始绝对肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)与CK-MB相对指数对急诊科潜在冠状动脉综合征患者进行前瞻性评估。
J Emerg Med. 2003 May;24(4):361-7. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(03)00030-1.
3
Delta CK-MB outperforms delta troponin I at 2 hours during the ED rule out of acute myocardial infarction.在急诊科排除急性心肌梗死时,发病2小时内肌酸激酶同工酶的变化值比肌钙蛋白I的变化值更具诊断价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90038-x.
4
The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.埃尔朗格胸痛评估方案:一项为期一年的经验,采用连续12导联心电图监测、两小时增量血清标志物测量以及选择性核素负荷试验来识别和排除急性冠脉综合征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;40(6):584-94. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.129506.
5
Comparison of a 6-hour and 9-hour protocol for evaluation of moderate-to-low risk chest pain patients in an emergency department diagnostic unit.急诊科诊断单元中评估中低风险胸痛患者的6小时和9小时方案比较。
Singapore Med J. 2001 Feb;42(2):52-6.
6
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
7
The impact of B-type natriuretic peptide in addition to troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin on the risk stratification of emergency department chest pain patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.除肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶-MB和肌红蛋白外,B型利钠肽对疑似急性冠脉综合征的急诊科胸痛患者风险分层的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
8
Another attempt at easing chest pain: ours and theirs.缓解胸痛的另一次尝试:我们的和他们的。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;8(7):752-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00198.x.
9
Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain.在低风险胸痛患者中,遥测监测对于识别心源性死亡和危及生命的室性心律失常缺乏实用性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00719-4.
10
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A 0/1-Hour Algorithm Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin.一种使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白的0/1小时算法。
J Acute Med. 2018 Jun 1;8(2):47-52. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201806_8(2).0002.
2
Provocative biomarker stress test: stress-delta N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide.激发性生物标志物应激试验:应激-ΔN末端B型利钠肽原
Open Heart. 2018 Oct 8;5(2):e000847. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000847. eCollection 2018.
3
Machine learning for risk prediction of acute coronary syndrome.用于急性冠状动脉综合征风险预测的机器学习
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1940-9. eCollection 2014.
4
Discrepancy between clinician and research assistant in TIMI score calculation (TRIAGED CPU).临床医生与研究助理在TIMI评分计算(分诊CPU)方面的差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21685. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
5
Is there coronary artery disease in the cancer patient who manifests with chest pain, shortness of breath and/or tachycardia? A retrospective observational cohort.表现为胸痛、呼吸急促和/或心动过速的癌症患者是否患有冠状动脉疾病?一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):419-26. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2396-8. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain.识别适合提前出院的患者:急性胸痛患者中决策规则的表现。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
7
Predictive value of a 4-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol in patients with suspected ischemic chest pain presenting to an emergency department.针对急诊科疑似缺血性胸痛患者的4小时快速诊断方案的预测价值。
Oman Med J. 2012 May;27(3):207-11. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.47.
8
Cholesteryl esters associated with acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase predict coronary artery disease in patients with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.与酰基辅酶 A:胆固醇酰基转移酶相关的胆固醇酯可预测有急性冠脉综合征症状的患者的冠状动脉疾病。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;19(6):673-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01378.x.
9
Can We Exclude the Diagnosis of Non-ST Segment Myocardial Infarction on the Basis of a Single Troponin I and a Symptom Duration ≥8 Hours?我们能否基于单次肌钙蛋白I及症状持续时间≥8小时排除非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的诊断?
ISRN Cardiol. 2011;2011:364728. doi: 10.5402/2011/364728. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
10
Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影在急性胸痛的风险分层和评估中是否是一种节省资源的策略?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 May;18(5):458-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01066.x.