Cleaton-Jones P, Daya N, Hargreaves J A, Côrtes D, Hargreaves V, Fatti L P
Dental Research Institute, Medical Research Council and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
SADJ. 2001 Apr;56(4):182-5.
To compare clinical reproducibility of dental caries diagnosis in the primary dentition under field conditions, a convenience sample of 5-year-old children in a nursery school in Germiston, was examined for dental caries by four dentists using visual (mirror), visual plus tactile (mirror plus probe) and fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI) methods. Seventeen children were examined on day one and 11 re-examined on day two. Inter-examiner agreement was high, above 90%. Visual examination on its own is comparable with the traditional visual plus tactile method and to FOTI under field conditions. New caries data collected by visual diagnosis alone may, reasonably, be compared with historical data diagnosed with visual + tactile examination.
为比较在现场条件下乳牙列龋齿诊断的临床可重复性,选取了杰明斯顿一所幼儿园5岁儿童的便利样本,由四名牙医分别使用视觉(镜子)、视觉加触觉(镜子加探针)和光纤透照(FOTI)方法对其进行龋齿检查。第一天检查了17名儿童,第二天对其中11名儿童进行了重新检查。检查者间的一致性很高,超过90%。在现场条件下,单独的视觉检查与传统的视觉加触觉方法以及FOTI相当。仅通过视觉诊断收集的新龋齿数据可以合理地与通过视觉加触觉检查诊断的历史数据进行比较。