Burger J, Snodgrass J
Division of Life, Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8082, USA.
Environ Res. 2001 Jun;86(2):157-66. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4245.
Tadpoles have been proposed as useful bioindicators of environmental contamination; yet, recently it has been shown that metal levels vary in different body compartments of tadpoles. Metals levels are higher in the digestive tract of bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles, which is usually not removed during such analysis. In this paper we examine the heavy metal levels in southern leopard frog (R. utricularia) tadpoles from several wetlands at the Savannah River Site and test the null hypotheses that (1) there are no differences in metal levels in different body compartments of the tadpoles, including the digestive tract; (2) there are no differences in heavy metal levels among different wetlands; and (3) there are no differences in the ratio of metals in the tail/body and in the digestive tract/body as a function of metal or developmental stage as indicated by body weight. Variations in heavy metal levels were explained by wetland and body compartment for all metals and by tadpole weight for selenium and manganese. In all cases, levels of metals were higher in the digestive tract than in the body or tail of tadpoles. Metal levels were highest in a wetland that had been remediated and lowest in a wetland that was never a pasture or remediated (i.e., was truly undisturbed). Although tadpoles are sometimes eaten by fish and other aquatic predators, leopard frogs usually avoid laying their eggs in ponds with such predators. However, avian predators will eat them. These data suggest that tadpoles can be used as bioindicators of differences in metal levels among wetlands and as indicators of potential exposure for higher-trophic-level organisms, but that to assess effects on the tadpoles themselves, digestive tracts should be removed before analysis.
蝌蚪已被提议作为环境污染的有用生物指标;然而,最近研究表明,蝌蚪不同身体部位的金属含量存在差异。牛蛙(Rana catesbeiana)蝌蚪消化道中的金属含量较高,而在这类分析中通常不会去除消化道。在本文中,我们检测了萨凡纳河地区多个湿地中南部豹蛙(R. utricularia)蝌蚪的重金属含量,并检验了以下零假设:(1)蝌蚪不同身体部位(包括消化道)的金属含量没有差异;(2)不同湿地之间的重金属含量没有差异;(3)根据体重所示,蝌蚪尾巴/身体以及消化道/身体中的金属比例不会随金属或发育阶段而变化。所有金属的重金属含量变化可由湿地和身体部位来解释,而硒和锰的含量变化可由蝌蚪体重来解释。在所有情况下,蝌蚪消化道中的金属含量均高于身体或尾巴中的含量。在一个已修复的湿地中金属含量最高,而在一个从未用作牧场或进行过修复(即真正未受干扰)的湿地中金属含量最低。尽管蝌蚪有时会被鱼类和其他水生捕食者吃掉,但豹蛙通常会避免在有这类捕食者的池塘中产卵。然而,鸟类捕食者会捕食它们。这些数据表明,蝌蚪可作为湿地间金属含量差异的生物指标以及高营养级生物潜在暴露的指标,但要评估对蝌蚪自身的影响,在分析前应去除消化道。